<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<?rfc strict='yes'?>
<?rfc iprnotified='no'?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-93"
     ipr="trust200902" obsoletes="rfc5320, rfc5558, rfc5720, rfc6179, rfc6706">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="AERO">Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO)</title>

    <author fullname="Fred L. Templin" initials="F. L." role="editor"
            surname="Templin">
      <organization>Boeing Research &amp; Technology</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>P.O. Box 3707</street>

          <city>Seattle</city>

          <region>WA</region>

          <code>98124</code>

          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>

        <email>fltemplin@acm.org</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date day="9" month="February" year="2021"/>

    <keyword>I-D</keyword>

    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document specifies an Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization
      (AERO) service for IP internetworking over Overlay Multilink Network
      (OMNI) interfaces. AERO/OMNI use an IPv6 link-local address format that
      supports operation of the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND) protocol and
      links ND to IP forwarding. Prefix delegation/registration services are
      employed for network admission and to manage the routing system.
      Multilink operation, mobility management, multicast, quality of service
      (QoS) signaling and route optimization are naturally supported through
      dynamic neighbor cache updates. AERO is a widely-applicable mobile
      internetworking service especially well-suited to aviation services,
      intelligent transportation systems, mobile Virtual Private Networks
      (VPNs) and many other applications.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section anchor="intro" title="Introduction">
      <t>Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO) fulfills the
      requirements of Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) <xref
      target="RFC7333"/> and route optimization <xref target="RFC5522"/> for
      aeronautical networking and other network mobility use cases such as
      intelligent transportation systems. AERO is an internetworking and
      mobility management service that employs the Overlay Multilink Network
      Interface (OMNI) <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>
      Non-Broadcast, Multiple Access (NBMA) virtual link model. The OMNI link
      is a virtual overlay configured over one or more underlying
      Internetworks, and nodes on the link can exchange IP packets as
      single-hop neighbors via encapsulation. The OMNI Adaptation Layer (OAL)
      supports multilink operation for increased reliability, bandwidth
      optimization and traffic path selection while accommodating Maximum
      Transmission Unit (MTU) diversity.</t>

      <t>The AERO service comprises Clients, Proxys, Servers and Relays that
      are seen as OMNI link neighbors as well as Bridges that interconnect
      OMNI link segments. Each node's OMNI interface uses an IPv6 link-local
      address format that supports operation of the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery
      (ND) protocol <xref target="RFC4861"/> and links ND to IP forwarding. A
      node's OMNI interface can be configured over multiple underlying
      interfaces, and therefore appears as a single interface with multiple
      link-layer addresses. Each link-layer address is subject to change due
      to mobility and/or QoS fluctuations, and link-layer address changes are
      signaled by ND messaging the same as for any IPv6 link.</t>

      <t>AERO provides a cloud-based service where mobile node Clients may use
      any Server acting as a Mobility Anchor Point (MAP) and fixed nodes may
      use any Relay on the link for efficient communications. Fixed nodes
      forward packets destined to other AERO nodes via the nearest Relay,
      which forwards them through the cloud. A mobile node's initial packets
      are forwarded through the Server, while direct routing is supported
      through asymmetric extended route optimization while data packets are
      flowing. Both unicast and multicast communications are supported, and
      mobile nodes may efficiently move between locations while maintaining
      continuous communications with correspondents and without changing their
      IP Address.</t>

      <t>AERO Bridges are interconnected in a secured private BGP overlay
      routing instance using encapsulation to provide a hybrid
      routing/bridging service that joins the underlying Internetworks of
      multiple disjoint administrative domains into a single unified OMNI
      link. Each OMNI link instance is characterized by the set of Mobility
      Service Prefixes (MSPs) common to all mobile nodes. The link extends to
      the point where a Relay/Server is on the optimal route from any
      correspondent node on the link, and provides a conduit between the
      underlying Internetwork and the OMNI link. To the underlying
      Internetwork, the Relay/Server is the source of a route to the MSP, and
      hence uplink traffic to the mobile node is naturally routed to the
      nearest Relay/Server.</t>

      <t>AERO can be used with OMNI links that span private-use Internetworks
      and/or public Internetworks such as the global Internet. In the latter
      case, some end systems may be located behind global Internet Network
      Address Translators (NATs). A means for robust traversal of NATs while
      avoiding "triangle routing" is therefore provided.</t>

      <t>AERO assumes the use of PIM Sparse Mode in support of multicast
      communication. In support of Source Specific Multicast (SSM) when a
      Mobile Node is the source, AERO route optimization ensures that a
      shortest-path multicast tree is established with provisions for mobility
      and multilink operation. In all other multicast scenarios there are no
      AERO dependencies.</t>

      <t>AERO was designed for aeronautical networking for both manned and
      unmanned aircraft, where the aircraft is treated as a mobile node that
      can connect an Internet of Things (IoT). AERO is also applicable to a
      wide variety of other use cases. For example, it can be used to
      coordinate the links of mobile nodes (e.g., cellphones, tablets, laptop
      computers, etc.) that connect into a home enterprise network via public
      access networks using tunneling software such as OpenVPN <xref
      target="OVPN"/> with VPN or non-VPN services enabled according to the
      appropriate security model. AERO can also be used to facilitate
      terrestrial vehicular and urban air mobility (as well as pedestrian
      communication services) for future intelligent transportation systems
      <xref target="I-D.ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking"/><xref
      target="I-D.templin-ipwave-uam-its"/>. Other applicable use cases are
      also in scope.</t>

      <t>The following numbered sections present the AERO specification. The
      appendices at the end of the document are non-normative.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="terminology" title="Terminology">
      <t>The terminology in the normative references applies; especially, the
      terminology in the OMNI specification <xref
      target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> is used extensively
      throughout. The following terms are defined within the scope of this
      document:</t>

      <t><list style="hanging">
          <t hangText="IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND)"><vspace/>an IPv6 control
          message service for coordinating neighbor relationships between
          nodes connected to a common link. AERO uses the ND service specified
          in <xref target="RFC4861"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="IPv6 Prefix Delegation "><vspace/>a networking service
          for delegating IPv6 prefixes to nodes on the link. The nominal
          service is DHCPv6 <xref target="RFC8415"/>, however alternate
          services (e.g., based on ND messaging) are also in scope. Most
          notably, a minimal form of prefix delegation known as "prefix
          registration" can be used if the Client knows its prefix in advance
          and can represent it in the IPv6 source address of an ND
          message.</t>

          <t hangText="Access Network (ANET)"><vspace/>a node's first-hop data
          link service network (e.g., a radio access network, cellular service
          provider network, corporate enterprise network, etc.) that often
          provides link-layer security services such as IEEE 802.1X and
          physical-layer security prevent unauthorized access internally and
          with border network-layer security services such as firewalls and
          proxys that prevent unauthorized outside access.</t>

          <t hangText="ANET interface"><vspace/>a node's attachment to a link
          in an ANET.</t>

          <t hangText="Internetwork (INET)"><vspace/>a connected IP network
          topology with a coherent routing and addressing plan and that
          provides a transit backbone service for ANET end systems. INETs also
          provide an underlay service over which the AERO virtual link is
          configured. Example INETs include corporate enterprise networks,
          aviation networks, and the public Internet itself. When there is no
          administrative boundary between an ANET and the INET, the ANET and
          INET are one and the same.</t>

          <t hangText="INET Partition"><vspace/>frequently, INETs such as
          large corporate enterprise networks are sub-divided internally into
          separate isolated partitions. Each partition is fully connected
          internally but disconnected from other partitions, and there is no
          requirement that separate partitions maintain consistent Internet
          Protocol and/or addressing plans. (Each INET partition is seen as a
          separate OMNI link segment as discussed below.)</t>

          <t hangText="INET interface"><vspace/>a node's attachment to a link
          in an INET.</t>

          <t hangText="INET address"><vspace/>an IP address assigned to a
          node's interface connection to an INET.</t>

          <t hangText="INET encapsulation"><vspace/>the encapsulation of a
          packet in an outer header or headers that can be routed within the
          scope of the local INET partition.</t>

          <t hangText="OMNI link"><vspace/>the same as defined in <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>, and manifested by IPv6
          encapsulation <xref target="RFC2473"/>. The OMNI link spans
          underlying INET segments joined by virtual bridges in a spanning
          tree the same as a bridged campus LAN. AERO nodes on the OMNI link
          appear as single-hop neighbors even though they may be separated by
          multiple underlying INET hops, and can use Segment Routing <xref
          target="RFC8402"/> to cause packets to visit selected waypoints on
          the link.</t>

          <t hangText="OMNI Interface"><vspace/>a node's attachment to an OMNI
          link. Since the addresses assigned to an OMNI interface are managed
          for uniqueness, OMNI interfaces do not require Duplicate Address
          Detection (DAD) and therefore set the administrative variable
          'DupAddrDetectTransmits' to zero <xref target="RFC4862"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="OMNI Adaptation Layer (OAL)"><vspace/>an OMNI interface
          process whereby packets admitted into the interface are wrapped in a
          mid-layer IPv6 header and fragmented/reassembled if necessary to
          support the OMNI link Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) over a
          diversity of paths. The OAL is also responsible for generating
          MTU-related control messages as necessary, and for providing
          addressing context for spanning multiple segments of a bridged OMNI
          link.</t>

          <t hangText="underlying interface"><vspace/>an ANET or INET
          interface over which an OMNI interface is configured.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobility Service Prefix (MSP)"><vspace/>an aggregated
          IP Global Unicast Address (GUA) prefix (e.g., 2001:db8::/32,
          192.0.2.0/24, etc.) assigned to the OMNI link and from which
          more-specific Mobile Network Prefixes (MNPs) are delegated. OMNI
          link administrators typically obtain MSPs from an Internet address
          registry, however private-use prefixes can alternatively be used
          subject to certain limitations (see: <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>). OMNI links that connect
          to the global Internet advertise their MSPs to their interdomain
          routing peers.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobile Network Prefix (MNP)"><vspace/>a longer IP
          prefix delegated from an MSP (e.g., 2001:db8:1000:2000::/56,
          192.0.2.8/30, etc.) and delegated to an AERO Client or Relay.</t>

          <t
          hangText="Mobile Network Prefix Link Local Address (MNP-LLA)"><vspace/>an
          IPv6 Link Local Address that embeds the most significant 64 bits of
          an MNP in the lower 64 bits of fe80::/64, as specified in <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>.</t>

          <t
          hangText="Mobile Network Prefix Unique Local Address (MNP-ULA)"><vspace/>an
          IPv6 Unique-Local Address derived from an MNP-LLA.</t>

          <t
          hangText="Administrative Link Local Address (ADM-LLA)"><vspace/>an
          IPv6 Link Local Address that embeds a 32-bit
          administratively-assigned identification value in the lower 32 bits
          of fe80::/96, as specified in <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>.</t>

          <t
          hangText="Administrative Unique Local Address (ADM-ULA)"><vspace/>an
          IPv6 Unique-Local Address derived from an ADM-LLA.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO node"><vspace/>a node that is connected to an OMNI
          link and participates in the AERO internetworking and mobility
          service.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Client (&quot;Client&quot;)"><vspace/>an AERO node
          that connects over one or more underlying interfaces and requests
          MNP delegation/registration service from AERO Servers. The Client
          assigns an MNP-LLA to the OMNI interface for use in ND exchanges
          with other AERO nodes and forwards packets to correspondents
          according to OMNI interface neighbor cache state.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Server (&quot;Server&quot;)"><vspace/>an INET node
          that configures an OMNI interface to provide default forwarding and
          Mobility Anchor Point (MAP) services for AERO Clients. The Server
          assigns an ADM-LLA to its OMNI interface to support the operation of
          the ND services, and advertises all of its associated MNPs via BGP
          peerings with Bridges.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Relay (&quot;Relay&quot;)"><vspace/>an AERO Server
          that also provides forwarding services between nodes reached via the
          OMNI link and correspondents on other links. AERO Relays are
          provisioned with MNPs (i.e., the same as for an AERO Client) and run
          a dynamic routing protocol to discover any non-MNP IP GUA routes in
          service on its connected INET links. In both cases, the Relay
          advertises the MSP(s) to its downstream networks, and distributes
          all of its associated MNPs and non-MNP IP GUA routes via BGP
          peerings with Bridges (i.e., the same as for an AERO Server).</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Bridge (&quot;Bridge&quot;)"><vspace/>a node that
          provides hybrid routing/bridging services (as well as a security
          trust anchor) for nodes on an OMNI link. As a router, the Bridge
          forwards packets using standard IP forwarding. As a bridge, the
          Bridge forwards packets over the OMNI link without decrementing the
          IPv6 Hop Limit. AERO Bridges peer with Servers and other Bridges to
          discover the full set of MNPs for the link as well as any non-MNP IP
          GUA routes that are reachable via Relays.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Proxy (&quot;Proxy&quot;)"><vspace/>a node that
          provides proxying services between Clients in an ANET and Servers in
          external INETs. The AERO Proxy is a conduit between the ANET and
          external INETs in the same manner as for common web proxys, and
          behaves in a similar fashion as for ND proxys <xref
          target="RFC4389"/>. A node may be configured to act as either a
          Proxy and/or a Server, depending on Client Server selection
          criteria.</t>

          <t hangText="ingress tunnel endpoint (ITE)"><vspace/>an OMNI
          interface endpoint that injects encapsulated packets into an OMNI
          link.</t>

          <t hangText="egress tunnel endpoint (ETE)"><vspace/>an OMNI
          interface endpoint that receives encapsulated packets from an OMNI
          link.</t>

          <t hangText="link-layer address"><vspace/>an IP address used as an
          encapsulation header source or destination address from the
          perspective of the OMNI interface. When an upper layer protocol
          (e.g., UDP) is used as part of the encapsulation, the port number is
          also considered as part of the link-layer address.</t>

          <t hangText="network layer address"><vspace/>the source or
          destination address of an encapsulated IP packet presented to the
          OMNI interface.</t>

          <t hangText="end user network (EUN)"><vspace/>an internal virtual or
          external edge IP network that an AERO Client or Relay connects to
          the rest of the network via the OMNI interface. The Client/Relay
          sees each EUN as a "downstream" network, and sees the OMNI interface
          as the point of attachment to the "upstream" network.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobile Node (MN)"><vspace/>an AERO Client and all of
          its downstream-attached networks that move together as a single
          unit, i.e., an end system that connects an Internet of Things.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobile Router (MR)"><vspace/>a MN's on-board router
          that forwards packets between any downstream-attached networks and
          the OMNI link. The MR is the MN entity that hosts the AERO
          Client.</t>

          <t hangText="Route Optimization Source (ROS)"><vspace/>the AERO node
          nearest the source that initiates route optimization. The ROS may be
          a Server or Proxy acting on behalf of the source Client, or may be
          the Client itself if the Client is connected to the INET either
          directly or through a NAT.</t>

          <t hangText="Route Optimization responder (ROR)"><vspace/>the AERO
          node nearest the target destination that responds to route
          optimization requests. The ROR may be a Server acting on behalf of a
          target MNP Client, or a Relay for a non-MNP destination.</t>

          <t hangText="MAP List"><vspace/>a geographically and/or
          topologically referenced list of addresses of all Servers within the
          same OMNI link. There is a single MAP list for the entire OMNI
          link.</t>

          <t hangText="Distributed Mobility Management (DMM)"><vspace/>a
          BGP-based overlay routing service coordinated by Servers and Bridges
          that tracks all Server-to-Client associations.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobility Service (MS)"><vspace/>the collective set of
          all Servers, Proxys, Bridges and Relays that provide the AERO
          Service to Clients.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobility Service Endpoint MSE)"><vspace/>an individual
          Server, Proxy, Bridge or Relay in the Mobility Service.</t>
        </list>Throughout the document, the simple terms "Client", "Server",
      "Bridge", "Proxy" and "Relay" refer to "AERO Client", "AERO Server",
      "AERO Bridge", "AERO Proxy" and "AERO Relay", respectively.
      Capitalization is used to distinguish these terms from other common
      Internetworking uses in which they appear without capitalization.</t>

      <t>The terminology of DHCPv6 <xref target="RFC8415"/> and IPv6 ND <xref
      target="RFC4861"/> (including the names of node variables, messages and
      protocol constants) is used throughout this document. The terms
      "All-Routers multicast", "All-Nodes multicast", "Solicited-Node
      multicast" and "Subnet-Router anycast" are defined in <xref
      target="RFC4291"/>. Also, the term "IP" is used to generically refer to
      either Internet Protocol version, i.e., IPv4 <xref target="RFC0791"/> or
      IPv6 <xref target="RFC8200"/>.</t>

      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
      "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14
      <xref target="RFC2119"/><xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when,
      they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="aerospec"
             title="Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO)">
      <t>The following sections specify the operation of IP over OMNI links
      using the AERO service:</t>

      <section anchor="node-types" title="AERO Node Types">
        <t>AERO Clients are Mobile Nodes (MNs) that configure OMNI interfaces
        over underlying interfaces with addresses that may change when the
        Client moves to a new network connection point. AERO Clients register
        their Mobile Network Prefixes (MNPs) with the AERO service, and
        distribute the MNPs to nodes on EUNs. AERO Bridges, Servers, Proxys
        and Relays are critical infrastructure elements in fixed (i.e.,
        non-mobile) INET deployments and hence have permanent and unchanging
        INET addresses. Together, they constitute the AERO service which
        provides an OMNI link virtual overlay for connecting AERO Clients.</t>

        <t>AERO Bridges provide hybrid routing/bridging services (as well as a
        security trust anchor) for nodes on an OMNI link. Bridges use standard
        IPv6 routing to forward packets both within the same INET partition
        and between disjoint INET partitions based on an IPv6 encapsulation
        mid-layer known as the OMNI Adaptation Layer (OAL) <xref
        target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>. During forwarding, the
        inner IP layer experiences a virtual bridging service since the inner
        IP TTL/Hop Limit is not decremented. Each Bridge also peers with
        Servers and other Bridges in a dynamic routing protocol instance to
        provide a Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) service for the list
        of active MNPs (see <xref target="scaling"/>). Bridges present the
        OMNI link as a set of one or more Mobility Service Prefixes (MSPs) and
        configure secured tunnels with Servers, Relays, Proxys and other
        Bridges; they further maintain IP forwarding table entries for each
        MNP and any other reachable non-MNP prefixes.</t>

        <t>AERO Servers in distributed INET locations provide default
        forwarding and mobility/multilink services for AERO Client Mobile
        Nodes (MNs). Each Server also peers with Bridges in a dynamic routing
        protocol instance to advertise its list of associated MNPs (see <xref
        target="scaling"/>). Servers facilitate prefix delegation/registration
        exchanges with Clients, where each delegated prefix becomes an MNP
        taken from an MSP. Servers forward packets between OMNI interface
        neighbors and track each Client's mobility profiles. Servers may
        further act as Servers for some sets of Clients and as Proxys for
        others.</t>

        <t>AERO Proxys provide a conduit for ANET Clients to associate with
        Servers in external INETs. Client and Servers exchange control plane
        messages via the Proxy acting as a bridge between the ANET/INET
        boundary. The Proxy forwards data packets between Clients and the OMNI
        link according to forwarding information in the neighbor cache. The
        Proxy function is specified in <xref target="aero-proxy"/>. Proxys may
        further act as Proxys for some sets of Clients and as Servers for
        others.</t>

        <t>AERO Relays are Servers that provide forwarding services between
        the OMNI interface and INET/EUN interfaces. Relays are provisioned
        with MNPs the same as for an AERO Client, and also run a dynamic
        routing protocol to discover any non-MNP IP routes. The Relay
        advertises the MSP(s) to its connected networks, and distributes all
        of its associated MNPs and non-MNP IP GUA routes via BGP peerings with
        Bridges</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="span" title="The AERO Service over OMNI Links">
        <section anchor="aero-reference" title="AERO/OMNI Reference Model">
          <t><xref target="chaining-fig"/> presents the basic OMNI link
          reference model:</t>

          <t><figure anchor="chaining-fig" title="AERO/OMNI Reference Model">
              <artwork><![CDATA[
                       +----------------+
                       | AERO Bridge B1 |
                       | Nbr: S1, S2, P1|
                       |(X1->S1; X2->S2)|
                       |      MSP M1    |
                       +-+---------+--+-+
    +--------------+     | Secured |  |     +--------------+
    |AERO Server S1|     | tunnels |  |     |AERO Server S2|
    |  Nbr: C1, B1 +-----+         |  +-----+  Nbr: C2, B1 |
    |  default->B1 |               |        |  default->B1 |
    |    X1->C1    |               |        |    X2->C2    |
    +-------+------+               |        +------+-------+
            |       OMNI link      |               |
    X===+===+===================+==)===============+===+===X
        |                       |  |                   |
  +-----+--------+     +--------+--+-----+    +--------+-----+
  |AERO Client C1|     |  AERO Proxy P1  |    |AERO Client C2|
  |    Nbr: S1   |     |(Proxy Nbr Cache)|    |   Nbr: S2    |
  | default->S1  |     +--------+--------+    | default->S2  |
  |    MNP X1    |              |             |    MNP X2    |
  +------+-------+     .--------+------.      +-----+--------+
         |           (- Proxyed Clients -)          |
        .-.            `---------------'           .-.
     ,-(  _)-.                                  ,-(  _)-.
  .-(_  IP   )-.   +-------+     +-------+    .-(_  IP   )-.
(__    EUN      )--|Host H1|     |Host H2|--(__    EUN      )
   `-(______)-'    +-------+     +-------+     `-(______)-'
]]></artwork>
            </figure> In this model:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>the OMNI link is an overlay network service configured over
              one or more underlying INET partitions which may be managed by
              different administrative authorities and have incompatible
              protocols and/or addressing plans.</t>

              <t>AERO Bridge B1 aggregates Mobility Service Prefix (MSP) M1,
              discovers Mobile Network Prefixes (MNPs) X* and advertises the
              MSP via BGP peerings over secured tunnels to Servers (S1, S2).
              Bridges connect the disjoint segments of a partitioned OMNI
              link.</t>

              <t>AERO Servers/Relays S1 and S2 configure secured tunnels with
              Bridge B1 and also provide mobility, multilink and default
              router services for their associated Clients C1 and C2.</t>

              <t>AERO Clients C1 and C2 associate with Servers S1 and S2,
              respectively. They receive Mobile Network Prefix (MNP)
              delegations X1 and X2, and also act as default routers for their
              associated physical or internal virtual EUNs. Simple hosts H1
              and H2 attach to the EUNs served by Clients C1 and C2,
              respectively.</t>

              <t>AERO Proxy P1 configures a secured tunnel with Bridge B1 and
              provides proxy services for AERO Clients in secured enclaves
              that cannot associate directly with other OMNI link
              neighbors.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>An OMNI link configured over a single INET appears as a single
          unified link with a consistent underlying network addressing plan.
          In that case, all nodes on the link can exchange packets via simple
          INET encapsulation, since the underlying INET is connected. In
          common practice, however, an OMNI link may be partitioned into
          multiple "segments", where each segment is a distinct INET
          potentially managed under a different administrative authority
          (e.g., as for worldwide aviation service providers such as ARINC,
          SITA, Inmarsat, etc.). Individual INETs may also themselves be
          partitioned internally, in which case each internal partition is
          seen as a separate segment.</t>

          <t>The addressing plan of each segment is consistent internally but
          will often bear no relation to the addressing plans of other
          segments. Each segment is also likely to be separated from others by
          network security devices (e.g., firewalls, proxys, packet filtering
          gateways, etc.), and in many cases disjoint segments may not even
          have any common physical link connections. Therefore, nodes can only
          be assured of exchanging packets directly with correspondents in the
          same segment, and not with those in other segments. The only means
          for joining the segments therefore is through inter-domain peerings
          between AERO Bridges.</t>

          <t>The same as for traditional campus LANs, multiple OMNI link
          segments can be joined into a single unified link via a virtual
          bridging service using the OMNI Adaptation Layer (OAL) <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> which inserts a mid-layer
          IPv6 encapsulation header that supports inter-segment forwarding
          (i.e., bridging) without decrementing the network-layer TTL/Hop
          Limit. This bridging of OMNI link segments is shown in <xref
          target="the-span"/>:</t>

          <figure anchor="the-span" title="Bridging OMNI Link Segments">
            <artwork><![CDATA[              . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
            .                                               .
            .              .-(::::::::)                     .
            .           .-(::::::::::::)-.   +-+            .
            .          (:::: Segment A :::)--|B|---+        .
            .           `-(::::::::::::)-'   +-+   |        .
            .              `-(::::::)-'            |        .
            .                                      |        .
            .              .-(::::::::)            |        .
            .           .-(::::::::::::)-.   +-+   |        .
            .          (:::: Segment B :::)--|B|---+        .
            .           `-(::::::::::::)-'   +-+   |        .
            .              `-(::::::)-'            |        .
            .                                      |        .
            .              .-(::::::::)            |        .
            .           .-(::::::::::::)-.   +-+   |        .
            .          (:::: Segment C :::)--|B|---+        .
            .           `-(::::::::::::)-'   +-+   |        .
            .              `-(::::::)-'            |        .
            .                                      |        .
            .                ..(etc)..             x        .
            .                                               .
            .                                               .
            .    <- OMNI link Bridged by encapsulation ->   .
              . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .  
]]></artwork>
          </figure>

          <t>Bridges, Servers, Relays and Proxys connect via secured INET
          tunnels over their respective segments in a spanning tree topology
          rooted at the Bridges. The secured spanning tree supports strong
          authentication for IPv6 ND control messages and may also be used to
          convey the initial data packets in a flow. Route optimization can
          then be employed to cause data packets to take more direct paths
          between OMNI link neighbors without having to strictly follow the
          spanning tree.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="aero-lla" title="Addressing and Node Identification">
          <t>AERO nodes on OMNI links use the Link-Local Address (LLA) prefix
          fe80::/64 <xref target="RFC4291"/> to assign LLAs used for
          network-layer addresses in link-scoped IPv6 ND and data messages.
          AERO Clients use LLAs constructed from MNPs (i.e., "MNP-LLAs") while
          other AERO nodes use LLAs constructed from administrative
          identification values ("ADM-LLAs") as specified in <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>.</t>

          <t>AERO nodes also use the Unique Local Address (ULA) prefix
          fd00::/8 followed by a pseudo-random 40-bit OMNI domain identifier
          to form the prefix [ULA]::/48, then include a 16-bit OMNI link
          identifier '*' to form the prefix [ULA*]::/64 <xref
          target="RFC4291"/>. The AERO node then uses the prefix [ULA*]::/64
          to form "MNP-ULAs" or "ADM-ULA"s as specified in <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> to support OAL
          addressing. AERO Clients also use Temporary ULAs constructed per
          <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>, where the
          addresses are typically used only in initial control message
          exchanges until a stable MNP-LLA/ULA is assigned.</t>

          <t>AERO MSPs and MNPs are typically based on Global Unicast
          Addresses (GUAs), but in some cases may be based on private-use
          addresses. See <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> for
          a full specification of LLAs, ULAs and GUAs used by AERO nodes on
          OMNI links.</t>

          <t>Finally, AERO Clients and Servers configure node identification
          values as specified in <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="scaling" title="AERO Routing System">
          <t>The AERO routing system comprises a private instance of the
          Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) <xref target="RFC4271"/> that is
          coordinated between Bridges and Servers and does not interact with
          either the public Internet BGP routing system or any underlying INET
          routing systems.</t>

          <t>In a reference deployment, each Server is configured as an
          Autonomous System Border Router (ASBR) for a stub Autonomous System
          (AS) using a 32-bit AS Number (ASN) <xref target="RFC4271"/> that is
          unique within the BGP instance, and each Server further uses eBGP to
          peer with one or more Bridges but does not peer with other Servers.
          Each INET of a multi-segment OMNI link must include one or more
          Bridges, which peer with the Servers and Proxys within that INET.
          All Bridges within the same INET are members of the same hub AS, and
          use iBGP to maintain a consistent view of all active MNPs currently
          in service. The Bridges of different INETs peer with one another
          using eBGP.</t>

          <t>Bridges advertise the OMNI link's MSPs and any non-MNP routes to
          each of their Servers. This means that any aggregated non-MNPs
          (including "default") are advertised to all Servers. Each Bridge
          configures a black-hole route for each of its MSPs. By black-holing
          the MSPs, the Bridge will maintain forwarding table entries only for
          the MNPs that are currently active, and packets destined to all
          other MNPs will correctly incur Destination Unreachable messages due
          to the black-hole route. In this way, Servers have only partial
          topology knowledge (i.e., they know only about the MNPs of their
          directly associated Clients) and they forward all other packets to
          Bridges which have full topology knowledge.</t>

          <t>Each OMNI link segment assigns a unique ADM-ULA sub-prefix of
          [ULA*]::/96. For example, a first segment could assign
          [ULA*]::1000/116, a second could assign [ULA*]::2000/116, a third
          could assign [ULA*]::3000/116, etc. Within each segment, each
          Proxy/Server configures an ADM-ULA within the segment's prefix,
          e.g., the Proxy/Servers within [ULA*]::2000/116 could assign the
          ADM-ULAs [ULA*]::2011/116, [ULA*]::2026/116, [ULA*]::2003/116,
          etc.</t>

          <t>The administrative authorities for each segment must therefore
          coordinate to assure mutually-exclusive ADM-ULA prefix assignments,
          but internal provisioning of ADM-ULAs an independent local
          consideration for each administrative authority. For each ADM-ULA
          prefix, the Bridge(s) that connect that segment assign the
          all-zero's address of the prefix as a Subnet Router Anycast address.
          For example, the Subnet Router Anycast address for [ULA*]::1023/116
          is simply [ULA*]::1000.</t>

          <t>ADM-ULA prefixes are statically represented in Bridge forwarding
          tables. Bridges join multiple segments into a unified OMNI link over
          multiple diverse administrative domains. They support a bridging
          function by first establishing forwarding table entries for their
          ADM-ULA prefixes either via standard BGP routing or static routes.
          For example, if three Bridges ('A', 'B' and 'C') from different
          segments serviced [ULA*]::1000/116, [ULA*]::2000/116 and
          [ULA*]::3000/116 respectively, then the forwarding tables in each
          Bridge are as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="hanging">
              <t hangText="A:">[ULA*]::1000/116-&gt;local,
              [ULA*]::2000/116-&gt;B, [ULA*]::3000/116-&gt;C</t>

              <t hangText="B:">[ULA*]::1000/116-&gt;A,
              [ULA*]::2000/116-&gt;local, [ULA*]::3000/116-&gt;C</t>

              <t hangText="C:">[ULA*]::1000/116-&gt;A, [ULA*]::2000/116-&gt;B,
              [ULA*]::3000/116-&gt;local</t>
            </list>These forwarding table entries are permanent and never
          change, since they correspond to fixed infrastructure elements in
          their respective segments.</t>

          <t>MNP ULAs are instead dynamically advertised in the AERO routing
          system by Servers and Relays that provide service for their
          corresponding MNPs. For example, if three Servers ('D', 'E' and 'F')
          service the MNPs 2001:db8:1000:2000::/56, 2001:db8:3000:4000::/56
          and 2001:db8:5000:6000::/56 then the routing system would
          include:<list style="hanging">
              <t hangText="D:">[ULA*]:2001:db8:1000:2000/120</t>

              <t hangText="E:">[ULA*]:2001:db8:3000:4000/120</t>

              <t hangText="F:">[ULA*]:2001:db8:5000:6000/120</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>A full discussion of the BGP-based routing system used by AERO is
          found in <xref target="I-D.ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp"/>.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="encaps-and-route" title="OMNI Link Segment Routing">
          <t>With the Client and partition prefixes in place in Bridge
          forwarding tables, the OMNI interface sends control and data packets
          toward AERO destination nodes located in the same segment using
          simple INET encapsulation without using the spanning tree. For
          destinations located in different OMNI link segments, the OMNI
          interface instead sends packets over the spanning tree via mid-layer
          encapsulation using the IPv6 OMNI Adaptation Layer (OAL) header
          <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>. When necessary,
          the OMNI interface also includes an OMNI Routing Header (ORH) as an
          extension to the OAL header if final segment forwarding information
          is available, e.g., in the neighbor cache. The ORH is formatted as
          shown in <xref target="orh"/>:</t>

          <t><figure anchor="orh" title="OMNI Routing Header (ORH) Format">
              <artwork><![CDATA[    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  Next Header  |  Hdr Ext Len  |  Routing Type |   SRT   | FMT |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                     Last Hop Segment-id (LHS)                 |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   ~                   Link Layer Address (L2ADDR)                 ~
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   ~                Destination Suffix (if necessary)              ~
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   ~                  Null Padding (if necessary)                  ~
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
            </figure>In this format:<list style="symbols">
              <t>Next Header identifies the type of header immediately
              following the ORH.</t>

              <t>Hdr Ext Len is the length of the Routing header in 8-octet
              units (not including the first 8 octets), with trailing padding
              added if necessary to produce an integral number of 8-octet
              units.</t>

              <t>Routing Type is set to TBD (see IANA Considerations).</t>

              <t>Segments Left is omitted, and replaced by a 5-bit SRT and
              3-bit FMT field.</t>

              <t>SRT - a 5-bit Segment Routing Topology prefix length value
              that (when added to 96) determines the prefix length to apply to
              the ADM-ULA formed from concatenating [ULA*]::/96 with the 32
              bit LHS value that follows. For example, the value 16
              corresponds to the prefix length 112.</t>

              <t>FMT - a 3-bit "Framework/Mode/Type" code corresponding to the
              included Link Layer Address as follows:<list style="symbols">
                  <t>When the most significant bit (i.e., "Framework") is set
                  to 1, L2ADDR is the INET encapsulation address for the
                  target Client itself; otherwise L2ADDR is the address of the
                  Server/Proxy named in the LHS.</t>

                  <t>When the next most significant bit (i.e., "Mode") is set
                  to 1, the Framework node is (likely) located behind an INET
                  Network Address Translator (NAT); otherwise, it is on the
                  open INET.</t>

                  <t>When the least significant bit (i.e., "Type") is set to
                  0, L2ADDR includes a UDP Port Number followed by an IPv4
                  address; otherwise, it includes a UDP Port Number followed
                  by an IPv6 address.</t>
                </list></t>

              <t>LHS - the 32 bit ID of a node in the Last Hop Segment that
              services the target. When SRT and LHS are both set to 0, the LHS
              is considered unspecified. When SRT is set to 0 and LHS is
              non-zero, the prefix length is set to 128. SRT and LHS provide
              guidance to the OMNI interface forwarding algorithm.
              Specifically, if SRT/LHS is located in the local OMNI link
              segment then the OMNI interface can omit OAL/ORH encapsulation
              and (following any necessary NAT traversal messaging) send
              directly to the target using INET encapsulation according to
              FMT/L2ADDR. Otherwise, it must perform INET/OAL/ORH
              encapsulation and forward according to the OMNI link spanning
              tree.</t>

              <t>Link Layer Address (L2ADDR) - Formatted according to FMT, and
              identifies the link-layer address (i.e., the encapsulation
              address) of the target. The UDP Port Number appears in the first
              two octets and the IP address appears in the next 4 octets for
              IPv4 or 16 octets for IPv6. The Port Number and IP address are
              recorded in network byte order, and in ones-compliment
              "obfuscated" form per <xref target="RFC4380"/>. The OMNI
              interface forwarding algorithm uses FMT/L2ADDR to determine the
              INET encapsulation address for local forwarding when SRT/LHS is
              located in the same OMNI link segment. Note that if the target
              is behind a NAT, L2ADDR will contain the mapped INET address
              stored in the NAT; otherwise, L2ADDR will contain the native
              INET information of the target itself.</t>

              <t>Destination Suffix is a 64-bit field included only for
              OAL-encapsulated packets that require OAL fragmentation. Present
              only when Hdr Ext Len indicates that at least 8 bytes follow
              L2ADDR. When present, encodes the 64-bit MNP-ULA suffix for the
              target Client. For example, if the MNP-ULA is
              [ULA*]:2001:db8:1:2 then the Destination suffix encodes the
              value 2001:db8:1:2.</t>

              <t>Null Padding contains zero-valued octets as necessary to pad
              the ORH to an integral number of 8-octet units.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>AERO nodes use OAL encapsulation when the target destination is
          located in a different OMNI link segment, or when OAL fragmentation
          is necessary (otherwise, OAL encapsulation is omitted and simple
          INET encapsulation is used). When an AERO node uses OAL
          encapsulation for a packet with source address 2001:db8:1:2::1 and
          destination address 2001:db8:1234:5678::1, it sets the OAL header
          source address to its own ULA (e.g., [ULA*]::1000:2000) and sets the
          destination address to the MNP-ULA corresponding to the IP
          destination address (e.g., [ULA*]::2001:db8:1234:5678).</t>

          <t>If the neighbor cache information indicates that the target is in
          a different segment, the node next inserts an ORH immediately
          following the OAL header while including the correct SRT, FMT, LHS,
          L2ADDR and Destination Suffix if fragmentation is needed (in this
          case, the Destination Suffix is 2001:db8:1234:5678). Next, the node
          overwrites the OAL header destination address with the LHS Subnet
          Router Anycast address (for example, for LHS 3000:4567 with SRT 16,
          the Subnet Router Anycast address is [ULA*]::3000:0000). (Note: if
          ADM-ULA of the last-hop Proxy/Server is known but the SRT, FMT, LHS
          and L2ADDR are not (yet) known, the node instead overwrites the OAL
          header destination address with the ADM-ULA.)</t>

          <t>The node then fragments the OAL/ORH packet if necessary, with
          each resulting fragment including the OAL/ORH headers while only the
          first fragment includes the original IPv6 header. The node finally
          encapsulates each resulting OAL/ORH packet/fragment in an INET
          header with source address set to its own INET address (e.g.,
          192.0.2.100) and destination set to the INET address of a Bridge
          (e.g., 192.0.2.1).</t>

          <t>The encapsulation format in the above example is shown in <xref
          target="span-encaps"> </xref>:<figure anchor="span-encaps"
              title="OAL/ORH Encapsulation">
              <artwork><![CDATA[     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |          INET Header          |
     |       src = 192.0.2.100       |
     |        dst = 192.0.2.1        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |    OAL Header (if necessary)  |
     |    src = [ULA*]::1000:2000    |
     |    dst= [ULA*]::3000:0000     |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |    ORH Header (if necessary)  |
     |      Destination Suffix:      |
     |      2001:db8:1234:5678       |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |        Inner IP Header        |
     |    src = 2001:db8:1:2::1      |
     |  dst = 2001:db8:1234:5678::1  |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+       
     |                               |
     ~                               ~
     ~      Inner Packet Body        ~
     ~                               ~
     |                               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
            </figure></t>

          <t>In this format, the inner IP header and packet body are the
          original IP packet, the OAL header is an IPv6 header prepared
          according to <xref target="RFC2473"/>, the ORH is a Routing Header
          extension of the OAL header, and the INET header is prepared as
          discussed in <xref target="aeroencaps"/>.</t>

          <t>This gives rise to a routing system that contains both Client
          prefix routes that may change dynamically due to regional node
          mobility and partition prefix routes that rarely if ever change. The
          Bridges can therefore provide link-layer bridging by sending packets
          over the spanning tree instead of network-layer routing according to
          MNP routes. As a result, opportunities for packet loss due to node
          mobility between different segments are mitigated.</t>

          <t>In normal operations, IPv6 ND messages are conveyed over secured
          paths between OMNI link neighbors so that specific Proxys, Servers
          or Relays can be addressed without being subject to mobility events.
          Conversely, only the first few packets destined to Clients need to
          traverse secured paths until route optimization can determine a more
          direct path.</t>

          <t>Note: When the source OAL has multiple inner IP packets to send
          to the same neighbor, it can perform "packing" to generate a
          "super-packet" as discussed in Section 5.2 of <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>. In that case, the
          OAL/ORH super-packet may include up to N inner packets as long as
          the total length of the super-packet does not exceed the OMNI
          interface MTU.</t>

          <t>Note: Use of an IPv6 "minimal encapsulation" format (i.e., an
          IPv6 variant of <xref target="RFC2004"/>) based on extensions to the
          ORH was considered and abandoned. In the approach, the ORH would be
          inserted as an extension header to the original IPv6 packet header.
          The IPv6 destination address would then be written into the ORH, and
          the ULA corresponding to the destination would be overwritten in the
          IPv6 destination address. This would seemingly convey enough
          forwarding information so that OAL encapsulation could be avoided.
          However, this "minimal encapsulation" IPv6 packet would then have a
          non-ULA source address and ULA destination address, an incorrect
          value in upper layer protocol checksums, and a Hop Limit that is
          decremented within the spanning tree when it should not be. The
          insertion and removal of the ORH would also entail rewriting the
          Payload Length and Next Header fields - again, invalidating upper
          layer checksums. These irregularities would result in implementation
          challenges and the potential for operational issues, e.g., since
          actionable ICMPv6 error reports could not be delivered to the
          original source. In order to address the issues, still more
          information such as the original IPv6 source address could be
          written into the ORH. However, with the additional information the
          benefit of the "minimal encapsulation" savings quickly diminishes,
          and becomes overshadowed by the implementation and operational
          irregularities.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="srt" title="Segment Routing Topologies (SRTs)">
          <t>The 64-bit sub-prefixes of [ULA]::/48 identify up to 2^16
          distinct Segment Routing Topologies (SRTs). Each SRT is a
          mutually-exclusive OMNI link overlay instance using a distinct set
          of ULAs, and emulates a Virtual LAN (VLAN) service for the OMNI
          link. In some cases (e.g., when redundant topologies are needed for
          fault tolerance and reliability) it may be beneficial to deploy
          multiple SRTs that act as independent overlay instances. A
          communication failure in one instance therefore will not affect
          communications in other instances.</t>

          <t>Each SRT is identified by a distinct value in bits 48-63 of
          [ULA]::/48, i.e., as [ULA0]::/64, [ULA1]::/64, [ULA2]::/64, etc.
          Each OMNI interface is identified by a unique interface name (e.g.,
          omni0, omni1, omni2, etc.) and assigns an anycast ADM-ULA
          corresponding to its SRT prefix length. The anycast ADM-ULA is used
          for OMNI interface determination in Safety-Based Multilink (SBM) as
          discussed in <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>. Each
          OMNI interface further applies Performance-Based Multilink (PBM)
          internally.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="seglink"
                 title="Segment Routing For OMNI Link Selection">
          <t>An original IPv6 source can direct an IPv6 packet to an AERO node
          by including a standard IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH) <xref
          target="RFC8754"/> with the anycast ADM-ULA for the selected SRT as
          either the IPv6 destination or as an intermediate hop within the
          SRH. This allows the original source to determine the specific OMNI
          link topology a packet will traverse when there may be multiple
          alternatives.</t>

          <t>When the AERO node processes the SRH and forwards the packet to
          the correct OMNI interface, the OMNI interface writes the next IPv6
          address from the SRH into the IPv6 destination address and
          decrements Segments Left. If decrementing would cause Segments Left
          to become 0, the OMNI interface deletes the SRH before forwarding.
          This form of Segment Routing supports Safety-Based Multilink
          (SBM).</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="segspan" title="Segment Routing Within the OMNI Link">
          <t>AERO node OMNI interfaces can insert OAL/ORH headers for Segment
          Routing within the OMNI link to influence the paths of packets
          destined to targets in remote segments without requiring all packets
          to traverse strict spanning tree paths.</t>

          <t>When an AERO node's OMNI interface has a packet to send to a
          target discovered through route optimization located in the same
          OMNI link segment, it encapsulates the packet in OAL/ORH headers if
          necessary as discussed above. The node then uses the target's Link
          Layer Address (L2ADDR) information for INET encapsulation.</t>

          <t>When an AERO node's OMNI interface has a packet to send to a
          route optimization target located in a remote OMNI link segment, it
          encapsulates the packet in OAL/ORH headers as discussed above while
          forwarding the packet to a Bridge with destination set to the Subnet
          Router Anycast address for the final OMNI link segment.</t>

          <t>When a Bridge receives a packet destined to its Subnet Router
          Anycast address with an OAL/ORH with SRT/LHS values corresponding to
          the local segment, it examines the L2ADDR according to FMT and
          removes the ORH from the packet; if the packet is not a fragment,
          the Bridge also removes the OAL header. If the packet was a
          fragment, the Bridge instead writes the MNP-ULA corresponding to the
          ORH Destination Suffix into the OAL destination address. The Bridge
          then encapsulates the packet/fragment in an INET header according to
          L2ADDR and forwards the packet within the INET either to the LHS
          Server/Proxy or directly to the target Client itself. In this way,
          the Bridge participates in route optimization to reduce traffic load
          and suboptimal routing through strict spanning tree paths.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="interface" title="OMNI Interface Characteristics">
        <t>OMNI interfaces are virtual interfaces configured over one or more
        underlying interfaces classified as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>INET interfaces connect to an INET either natively or through
            one or several NATs. Native INET interfaces have global IP
            addresses that are reachable from any INET correspondent. All
            Server, Relay and Bridge interfaces are native interfaces, as are
            INET-facing interfaces of Proxys. NATed INET interfaces connect to
            a private network behind one or more NATs that provide INET
            access. Clients that are behind a NAT are required to send
            periodic keepalive messages to keep NAT state alive when there are
            no data packets flowing.</t>

            <t>ANET interfaces connect to an ANET that is separated from the
            open INET by a Proxy. Proxys can actively issue control messages
            over the INET on behalf of the Client to reduce ANET
            congestion.</t>

            <t>VPNed interfaces use security encapsulation over the INET to a
            Virtual Private Network (VPN) server that also acts as a Server or
            Proxy. Other than the link-layer encapsulation format, VPNed
            interfaces behave the same as Direct interfaces.</t>

            <t>Direct (i.e., single-hop point-to-point) interfaces connect a
            Client directly to a Server or Proxy without crossing any
            ANET/INET paths. An example is a line-of-sight link between a
            remote pilot and an unmanned aircraft. The same Client
            considerations apply as for VPNed interfaces.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>OMNI interfaces use OAL/ORH encapsulation as necessary as discussed
        in <xref target="encaps-and-route"/>. OMNI interfaces use link-layer
        encapsulation (see: <xref target="aeroencaps"/>) to exchange packets
        with OMNI link neighbors over INET or VPNed interfaces as well as over
        ANET interfaces for which the Client and Proxy may be multiple IP hops
        away. OMNI interfaces do not use link-layer encapsulation over Direct
        underlying interfaces or ANET interfaces when the Client and Proxy are
        known to be on the same underlying link.</t>

        <t>OMNI interfaces maintain a neighbor cache for tracking per-neighbor
        state the same as for any interface. OMNI interfaces use ND messages
        including Router Solicitation (RS), Router Advertisement (RA),
        Neighbor Solicitation (NS) and Neighbor Advertisement (NA) for
        neighbor cache management.</t>

        <t>OMNI interfaces send ND messages with an OMNI option formatted as
        specified in <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>. The
        OMNI option includes prefix registration information and Interface
        Attributes containing link information parameters for the OMNI
        interface's underlying interfaces. Each OMNI option may include
        multiple Interface Attributes sub-options, each identified by an
        ifIndex value.</t>

        <t>A Client's OMNI interface may be configured over multiple
        underlying interface connections. For example, common mobile handheld
        devices have both wireless local area network ("WLAN") and cellular
        wireless links. These links are often used "one at a time" with
        low-cost WLAN preferred and highly-available cellular wireless as a
        standby, but a simultaneous-use capability could provide benefits. In
        a more complex example, aircraft frequently have many wireless data
        link types (e.g. satellite-based, cellular, terrestrial, air-to-air
        directional, etc.) with diverse performance and cost properties.</t>

        <t>If a Client's multiple underlying interfaces are used "one at a
        time" (i.e., all other interfaces are in standby mode while one
        interface is active), then ND message OMNI options include only a
        single Interface Attributes sub-option set to constant values. In that
        case, the Client would appear to have a single interface but with a
        dynamically changing link-layer address.</t>

        <t>If the Client has multiple active underlying interfaces, then from
        the perspective of ND it would appear to have multiple link-layer
        addresses. In that case, ND message OMNI options MAY include multiple
        Interface Attributes sub-options - each with values that correspond to
        a specific interface. Every ND message need not include Interface
        Attributes for all underlying interfaces; for any attributes not
        included, the neighbor considers the status as unchanged.</t>

        <t>Bridge, Server and Proxy OMNI interfaces may be configured over one
        or more secured tunnel interfaces. The OMNI interface configures both
        an ADM-LLA and its corresponding ADM-ULA, while the underlying secured
        tunnel interfaces are either unnumbered or configure the same ULA. The
        OMNI interface encapsulates each IP packet in OAL/ORH headers and
        presents the packet to the underlying secured tunnel interface.
        Routing protocols such as BGP that run over the OMNI interface do not
        employ OAL/ORH encapsulation, but rather present the routing protocol
        messages directly to the underlying secured tunnels while using the
        ULA as the source address. This distinction must be honored
        consistently according to each node's configuration so that the IP
        forwarding table will associate discovered IP routes with the correct
        interface.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroinit" title="OMNI Interface Initialization">
        <t>AERO Servers, Proxys and Clients configure OMNI interfaces as their
        point of attachment to the OMNI link. AERO nodes assign the MSPs for
        the link to their OMNI interfaces (i.e., as a "route-to-interface") to
        ensure that packets with destination addresses covered by an MNP not
        explicitly assigned to a non-OMNI interface are directed to the OMNI
        interface.</t>

        <t>OMNI interface initialization procedures for Servers, Proxys,
        Clients and Bridges are discussed in the following sections.</t>

        <section anchor="sinit" title="AERO Server/Relay Behavior">
          <t>When a Server enables an OMNI interface, it assigns an
          ADM-{LLA,ULA} appropriate for the given OMNI link segment. The
          Server also configures secured tunnels with one or more neighboring
          Bridges and engages in a BGP routing protocol session with each
          Bridge.</t>

          <t>The OMNI interface provides a single interface abstraction to the
          IP layer, but internally comprises multiple secured tunnels as well
          as an NBMA nexus for sending encapsulated data packets to OMNI
          interface neighbors. The Server further configures a service to
          facilitate ND exchanges with AERO Clients and manages per-Client
          neighbor cache entries and IP forwarding table entries based on
          control message exchanges.</t>

          <t>Relays are simply Servers that run a dynamic routing protocol to
          redistribute routes between the OMNI interface and INET/EUN
          interfaces (see: <xref target="scaling"/>). The Relay provisions
          MNPs to networks on the INET/EUN interfaces (i.e., the same as a
          Client would do) and advertises the MSP(s) for the OMNI link over
          the INET/EUN interfaces. The Relay further provides an attachment
          point of the OMNI link to a non-MNP-based global topology.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="pinit" title="AERO Proxy Behavior">
          <t>When a Proxy enables an OMNI interface, it assigns an ADM-{LLA,
          ULA} and configures permanent neighbor cache entries the same as for
          Servers. The Proxy also configures secured tunnels with one or more
          neighboring Bridges and maintains per-Client neighbor cache entries
          based on control message exchanges. Importantly Proxys are often
          configured to act as Servers, and vice-versa.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="cinit" title="AERO Client Behavior">
          <t>When a Client enables an OMNI interface, it assigns either an
          MNP-{LLA, ULA} or a Temporary ULA and sends RS messages with ND
          parameters over its underlying interfaces to a Server, which returns
          an RA message with corresponding parameters. The RS/RA messages may
          pass through a Proxy in the case of a Client's ANET interface, or
          through one or more NATs in the case of a Client's INET interface.
          (Note: if the Client used a Temporary ULA in its initial RS message,
          it will discover an MNP-{LLA, ULA} in the corresponding RA that it
          receives from the Server and begin using these new addresses while
          deprecating the Temporary addresses. If the Client is operating
          outside the context of AERO infrastructure, however, it may continue
          using Temporary ULAs for Client-to-Client communications until it
          encounters an infrastructure element that can provide an MNP.)</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="rinit" title="AERO Bridge Behavior">
          <t>AERO Bridges configure an OMNI interface and assign the ADM-ULA
          Subnet Router Anycast address for each OMNI link segment they
          connect to. Bridges configure secured tunnels with Servers, Proxys
          and other Bridges, and engage in a BGP routing protocol session with
          neighbors on the spanning tree (see: <xref target="scaling"/>).</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroncache"
               title="OMNI Interface Neighbor Cache Maintenance">
        <t>Each OMNI interface maintains a conceptual neighbor cache that
        includes an entry for each neighbor it communicates with on the OMNI
        link per <xref target="RFC4861"/>. OMNI interface neighbor cache
        entries are said to be one of "permanent", "symmetric", "asymmetric"
        or "proxy".</t>

        <t>Permanent neighbor cache entries are created through explicit
        administrative action; they have no timeout values and remain in place
        until explicitly deleted. AERO Bridges maintain permanent neighbor
        cache entries for their associated Proxys/Servers (and vice-versa).
        Each entry maintains the mapping between the neighbor's network-layer
        LLA and corresponding INET address.</t>

        <t>Symmetric neighbor cache entries are created and maintained through
        RS/RA exchanges as specified in <xref target="aeropd"/>, and remain in
        place for durations bounded by prefix lifetimes. AERO Servers maintain
        symmetric neighbor cache entries for each of their associated Clients,
        and AERO Clients maintain symmetric neighbor cache entries for each of
        their associated Servers.</t>

        <t>Asymmetric neighbor cache entries are created or updated based on
        route optimization messaging as specified in <xref
        target="predirect"/>, and are garbage-collected when keepalive timers
        expire. AERO ROSs maintain asymmetric neighbor cache entries for
        active targets with lifetimes based on ND messaging constants.
        Asymmetric neighbor cache entries are unidirectional since only the
        ROS (and not the ROR) creates an entry.</t>

        <t>Proxy neighbor cache entries are created and maintained by AERO
        Proxys when they process Client/Server ND exchanges, and remain in
        place for durations bounded by ND and prefix lifetimes. AERO Proxys
        maintain proxy neighbor cache entries for each of their associated
        Clients. Proxy neighbor cache entries track the Client state and the
        address of the Client's associated Server(s).</t>

        <t>To the list of neighbor cache entry states in Section 7.3.2 of
        <xref target="RFC4861"/>, Proxy and Server OMNI interfaces add an
        additional state DEPARTED that applies to symmetric and proxy neighbor
        cache entries for Clients that have recently departed. The interface
        sets a "DepartTime" variable for the neighbor cache entry to
        "DEPART_TIME" seconds. DepartTime is decremented unless a new ND
        message causes the state to return to REACHABLE. While a neighbor
        cache entry is in the DEPARTED state, packets destined to the target
        Client are forwarded to the Client's new location instead of being
        dropped. When DepartTime decrements to 0, the neighbor cache entry is
        deleted. It is RECOMMENDED that DEPART_TIME be set to the default
        constant value REACHABLE_TIME plus 10 seconds (40 seconds by default)
        to allow a window for packets in flight to be delivered while stale
        route optimization state may be present.</t>

        <t>When an ROR receives an authentic NS message used for route
        optimization, it searches for a symmetric neighbor cache entry for the
        target Client. The ROR then returns a solicited NA message without
        creating a neighbor cache entry for the ROS, but creates or updates a
        target Client "Report List" entry for the ROS and sets a "ReportTime"
        variable for the entry to REPORT_TIME seconds. The ROR resets
        ReportTime when it receives a new authentic NS message, and otherwise
        decrements ReportTime while no authentic NS messages have been
        received. It is RECOMMENDED that REPORT_TIME be set to the default
        constant value REACHABLE_TIME plus 10 seconds (40 seconds by default)
        to allow a window for route optimization to converge before ReportTime
        decrements below REACHABLE_TIME.</t>

        <t>When the ROS receives a solicited NA message response to its NS
        message used for route optimization, it creates or updates an
        asymmetric neighbor cache entry for the target network-layer and
        link-layer addresses. The ROS then (re)sets ReachableTime for the
        neighbor cache entry to REACHABLE_TIME seconds and uses this value to
        determine whether packets can be forwarded directly to the target,
        i.e., instead of via a default route. The ROS otherwise decrements
        ReachableTime while no further solicited NA messages arrive. It is
        RECOMMENDED that REACHABLE_TIME be set to the default constant value
        30 seconds as specified in <xref target="RFC4861"/>.</t>

        <t>AERO nodes also use the value MAX_UNICAST_SOLICIT to limit the
        number of NS keepalives sent when a correspondent may have gone
        unreachable, the value MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS to limit the number of RS
        messages sent without receiving an RA and the value
        MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT to limit the number of unsolicited NAs that
        can be sent based on a single event. It is RECOMMENDED that
        MAX_UNICAST_SOLICIT, MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS and
        MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT be set to 3 the same as specified in <xref
        target="RFC4861"/>.</t>

        <t>Different values for DEPART_TIME, REPORT_TIME, REACHABLE_TIME,
        MAX_UNICAST_SOLICIT, MAX_RTR_SOLCITATIONS and
        MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT MAY be administratively set; however, if
        different values are chosen, all nodes on the link MUST consistently
        configure the same values. Most importantly, DEPART_TIME and
        REPORT_TIME SHOULD be set to a value that is sufficiently longer than
        REACHABLE_TIME to avoid packet loss due to stale route optimization
        state.</t>

        <section anchor="STLLAO" title="OMNI Neighbor Interface Attributes">
          <t>OMNI interface IPv6 ND messages include OMNI options <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> with Interface Attributes
          that provide Link-Layer Address and QoS Preference information for
          the neighbor's underlying interfaces. This information is stored in
          the neighbor cache and provides the basis for the forwarding
          algorithm specified in <xref target="aeroalg"/>. The information is
          cumulative and reflects the union of the OMNI information from the
          most recent ND messages received from the neighbor; it is therefore
          not required that each ND message contain all neighbor
          information.</t>

          <t>The OMNI option Interface Attributes for each underlying
          interface includes a two-part "Link-Layer Address" consisting of a
          simple IP encapsulation address determined by the FMT and L2ADDR
          fields and an ADM-ULA determined by the SRT and LHS fields. If the
          neighbor is located in the local OMNI link segment (and, if any
          necessary NAT state has been established) forwarding via simple IP
          encapsulation can be used; otherwise, OAL encapsulation must be
          used. Underlying interfaces are further selected based on their
          associated preference values "high", "medium", "low" or
          "disabled".</t>

          <t>Note: the OMNI option is distinct from any Source/Target
          Link-Layer Address Options (S/TLLAOs) that may appear in an ND
          message according to the appropriate IPv6 over specific link layer
          specification (e.g., <xref target="RFC2464"/>). If both an OMNI
          option and S/TLLAO appear, the former pertains to encapsulation
          addresses while the latter pertains to the native L2 address format
          of the underlying media.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="naflags"
                 title="OMNI Neighbor Advertisement Message Flags">
          <t>As discussed in Section 4.4 of <xref target="RFC4861"/> NA
          messages include three flag bits R, S and O. OMNI interface NA
          messages treat the flags as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>R: The R ("Router") flag is set to 1 in the NA messages sent
              by all AERO/OMNI node types. Simple hosts that would set R to 0
              do not occur on the OMNI link itself, but may occur on the
              downstream links of Clients and Relays.</t>

              <t>S: The S ("Solicited") flag is set exactly as specified in
              Section 4.4. of <xref target="RFC4861"/>, i.e., it is set to 1
              for Solicited NAs and set to 0 for Unsolicited NAs (both unicast
              and multicast).</t>

              <t>O: The O ("Override") flag is set to 0 for solicited proxy
              NAs and set to 1 for all other solicited and unsolicited NAs.
              For further study is whether solicited NAs for anycast targets
              apply for OMNI links. Since MNP-LLAs must be uniquely assigned
              to Clients to support correct ND protocol operation, however, no
              role is currently seen for assigning the same MNP-LLA to
              multiple Clients.</t>
            </list></t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroencaps"
               title="OMNI Interface Encapsulation and Re-encapsulation">
        <t>The OMNI Adaptation Layer (OAL) inserts mid-layer IPv6 headers
        known as the OAL/ORH headers when necessary as discussed in the
        following sections. After either inserting or omitting the OAL/ORH
        headers, the OMNI interface also inserts or omits an outer ANET/INET
        encapsulation header as discussed below.</t>

        <t>OMNI interfaces avoid outer encapsulation over Direct underlying
        interfaces and ANET underlying interfaces for which the Client and
        Proxy are connected to the same underlying link. Otherwise, OMNI
        interfaces encapsulate packets according to whether they are entering
        the OMNI interface from the network layer or if they are being
        re-admitted into the same OMNI link they arrived on. This latter form
        of encapsulation is known as "re-encapsulation".</t>

        <t>For packets entering the OMNI interface from the network layer, the
        OMNI interface copies the "TTL/Hop Limit", "Type of Service/Traffic
        Class" <xref target="RFC2983"/>, "Flow Label"<xref target="RFC6438">
        </xref> (for IPv6) and "Congestion Experienced" <xref
        target="RFC3168"/> values in the inner packet's IP header into the
        corresponding fields in the OAL and outer encapsulation header(s).</t>

        <t>For packets undergoing re-encapsulation, the OMNI interface instead
        copies these values from the original encapsulation header into the
        new encapsulation header, i.e., the values are transferred between
        encapsulation headers and *not* copied from the encapsulated packet's
        network-layer header. (Note especially that by copying the TTL/Hop
        Limit between encapsulation headers the value will eventually
        decrement to 0 if there is a (temporary) routing loop.)</t>

        <t>OMNI interfaces configured over ANET underlying interfaces which
        employ a different IP protocol version (and/or when the Client and
        Proxy may be separated by multiple ANET IP hops) use IP-in-IP
        encapsulation so that the inner packet can traverse the ANET without
        decrementing the TTL/Hop-Limit. IPv6 underlying ANET interfaces use
        <xref target="RFC2473"/> encapsulation, while IPv4 interfaces use the
        appropriate encapsulation per one of <xref target="RFC5214"/><xref
        target="RFC2003"/>.</t>

        <t>OMNI interfaces configured over INET underlying interfaces
        encapsulate packets in INET headers according to the next hop
        determined in the forwarding algorithm in <xref target="aeroalg"/>. If
        the next hop is reached via a secured tunnel, the OMNI interface uses
        an encapsulation format specific to the secured tunnel type (see:
        <xref target="secure"/>). If the next hop is reached via an unsecured
        INET interface, the OMNI interface instead uses UDP/IP encapsulation
        per <xref target="RFC6081"/><xref target="RFC4380"/>.</t>

        <t>When UDP/IP encapsulation is used, the OMNI interface next sets the
        UDP source port to a constant value that it will use in each
        successive packet it sends, and sets the UDP length field to the
        length of the encapsulated packet plus 8 bytes for the UDP header
        itself plus the length of any included extension headers or trailers.
        The encapsulated packet may be either IPv6 or IPv4, as distinguished
        by the version number found in the first four bits following the UDP
        header.</t>

        <t>For UDP/IP-encapsulated packets sent to a Server, Relay or Bridge,
        the OMNI interface sets the UDP destination port to 8060, i.e., the
        IANA-registered port number for AERO. For packets sent to a Client,
        the OMNI interface sets the UDP destination port to the port value
        stored in the neighbor cache entry for this Client. The OMNI interface
        finally includes/omits the UDP checksum according to <xref
        target="RFC6935"/><xref target="RFC6936"/>.</t>

        <t>When a Proxy, Relay or Server re-encapsulates a packet received
        from a Client that includes an OAL but no ORH, it inserts an ORH
        immediately following the OAL header and adjusts the OAL payload
        length and destination address field. The inserted ORH will be removed
        by the final-hop Bridge, but its insertion and removal will not
        interfere with reassembly at the final destination. For this reason,
        Clients must reserve 40 bytes for a maximum-length ORH when they
        perform OAL encapsulation (see: <xref target="aeromtu"/>).</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aerodecaps" title="OMNI Interface Decapsulation">
        <t>OMNI interfaces decapsulate packets destined either to the AERO
        node itself or to a destination reached via an interface other than
        the OMNI interface the packet was received on. When the encapsulated
        packet arrives in multiple OAL fragments, the OMNI interface
        reassembles as discussed in <xref target="aeromtu"/>. Further
        decapsulation steps are performed according to the appropriate
        encapsulation format specification.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroauth"
               title="OMNI Interface Data Origin Authentication">
        <t>AERO nodes employ simple data origin authentication procedures. In
        particular:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>AERO Bridges, Servers and Proxys accept encapsulated data
            packets and control messages received from the (secured) spanning
            tree.</t>

            <t>AERO Proxys and Clients accept packets that originate from
            within the same secured ANET.</t>

            <t>AERO Clients and Relays accept packets from downstream network
            correspondents based on ingress filtering.</t>

            <t>AERO Clients, Relays and Servers verify the outer UDP/IP
            encapsulation addresses according to <xref target="RFC4380"/>.</t>
          </list>AERO nodes silently drop any packets that do not satisfy the
        above data origin authentication procedures. Further security
        considerations are discussed in <xref target="secure"/>.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeromtu"
               title="OMNI Adaptation Layer and OMNI Interface MTU">
        <t>The OMNI interface observes the link nature of tunnels, including
        the Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU), Maximum Reassembly Unit (MRU) and
        the role of fragmentation and reassembly <xref
        target="I-D.ietf-intarea-tunnels"/>. The OMNI interface employs an
        OMNI Adaptation Layer (OAL) for accommodating multiple underlying
        links with diverse MTUs. The functions of the OAL and the OMNI
        interface MTU/MRU are specified in Section 5 of <xref
        target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>, with MTU/MRU both set to
        the constant value 9180 bytes.</t>

        <t>When the network layer presents an IP packet to the OMNI interface,
        the OAL encapsulates the packet in OAL and ORH headers if necessary.
        When the network layer presents the OMNI interface with multiple IP
        packets bound to the same neighbor, the OAL can concatenate multiple
        IP packets together into a single OAL super-packet as discussed in
        Section 5.2 of <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>. The
        OAL then fragments the encapsulated packet if necessary such that the
        OAL/ORH headers appear in each fragment while the original IP packet
        header appears only in the first fragment. The OAL then transmits each
        OAL/ORH packet/fragment over an underlying interface connected to
        either a physical link such as Ethernet, WiFi and the like or a
        virtual link such as an Internet or higher-layer tunnel (see the
        definition of link in <xref target="RFC8200"/>).</t>

        <t>Note: A Client that does not (yet) have neighbor cache state for a
        target may omit the ORH in packets with the understanding that a
        Proxy/Server may insert an ORH on its behalf. For this reason, Clients
        reserve 40 bytes for the largest possible ORH in their OAL fragment
        size calculations.</t>

        <t>Note: Although the ORH may be removed by a Bridge on the path (see:
        <xref target="rforw"/>), this does not interfere with the
        destination's ability to reassemble in the event that the packet was
        fragmented. This is due to the fact that the ORH is not included in
        the fragmentable part; therefore, its removal does not invalidate the
        offset values in any fragment headers.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroalg" title="OMNI Interface Forwarding Algorithm">
        <t>IP packets enter a node's OMNI interface either from the network
        layer (i.e., from a local application or the IP forwarding system) or
        from the link layer (i.e., from an OMNI interface neighbor). All
        packets entering a node's OMNI interface first undergo data origin
        authentication as discussed in <xref target="aeroauth"/>. Packets that
        satisfy data origin authentication are processed further, while all
        others are dropped silently. The OMNI interface OAL wraps accepted
        packets in OAL/ORH headers if necessary as discussed above.</t>

        <t>Packets that enter the OMNI interface from the network layer are
        forwarded to an OMNI interface neighbor. Packets that enter the OMNI
        interface from the link layer are either re-admitted into the OMNI
        link or forwarded to the network layer where they are subject to
        either local delivery or IP forwarding. In all cases, the OMNI
        interface itself MUST NOT decrement the network layer TTL/Hop-count
        since its forwarding actions occur below the network layer.</t>

        <t>OMNI interfaces may have multiple underlying interfaces and/or
        neighbor cache entries for neighbors with multiple underlying
        interfaces (see <xref target="interface"/>). The OMNI interface uses
        interface attributes and/or traffic classifiers (e.g., DSCP value,
        port number, flow specification, etc.) to select an outgoing
        underlying interface for each packet based on the node's own QoS
        preferences, and also to select a destination link-layer address based
        on the neighbor's underlying interface with the highest preference.
        AERO implementations SHOULD allow for QoS preference values to be
        modified at runtime through network management.</t>

        <t>If multiple outgoing interfaces and/or neighbor interfaces have a
        preference of "high", the AERO node replicates the packet and sends
        one copy via each of the (outgoing / neighbor) interface pairs;
        otherwise, the node sends a single copy of the packet via an interface
        with the highest preference. AERO nodes keep track of which underlying
        interfaces are currently "reachable" or "unreachable", and only use
        "reachable" interfaces for forwarding purposes.</t>

        <t>The following sections discuss the OMNI interface forwarding
        algorithms for Clients, Proxys, Servers and Bridges. In the following
        discussion, a packet's destination address is said to "match" if it is
        the same as a cached address, or if it is covered by a cached prefix
        (which may be encoded in an MNP-LLA).</t>

        <section anchor="cforw" title="Client Forwarding Algorithm">
          <t>When an IP packet enters a Client's OMNI interface from the
          network layer the Client searches for an asymmetric neighbor cache
          entry that matches the destination. If there is a match, the Client
          uses one or more "reachable" neighbor interfaces in the entry for
          packet forwarding. If there is no asymmetric neighbor cache entry,
          the Client instead forwards the packet toward a Server (the packet
          is intercepted by a Proxy if there is a Proxy on the path). The
          Client encapsulates the packet in OAL/ORH headers if necessary and
          fragments according to MTU requirements (see: <xref
          target="aeromtu"/>). The Client sets the OAL destination address to
          the MNP-ULA of the neighbor if it has an asymmetric neighbor cache
          entry; otherwise, it sets the OAL destination to the ADM-ULA of the
          Proxy/Server. If the Client has multiple IP packets to send to the
          same neighbor, it can concatenate them in a single super-packet as
          discussed in Section 5.2 of <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>.</t>

          <t>If there is an asymmetric neighbor cache entry and the neighbor
          interface selected for forwarding is located on the same OMNI link
          segment and not behind a NAT, the Client forwards the
          packet/fragments directly according to the L2ADDR information for
          the neighbor. If the neighbor interface is behind a NAT on the same
          OMNI link segment, the Client instead forwards the initial
          packet/fragments to its Server and initiates NAT traversal
          procedures. If the Client's intended source underlying interface is
          also behind a NAT and located on the same OMNI link segment, it
          sends a "direct bubble" over the interface per <xref
          target="RFC6081"/><xref target="RFC4380"/> to the L2ADDR found in
          the neighbor cache in order to establish state in its own NAT by
          generating traffic toward the neighbor (note that no response to the
          bubble is expected).</t>

          <t>The Client next sends an NS(NUD) message toward the MNP-ULA of
          the neighbor via its Server as discussed in <xref target="nud"/>. If
          the Client receives an NA(NUD) from the neighbor over the underlying
          interface, it marks the neighbor interface as "trusted" and sends
          future packets/fragments directly to the L2ADDR information for the
          neighbor instead of indirectly via the Server. The Client must honor
          the neighbor cache maintenance procedure by sending additional
          direct bubbles and/or NS/NA(NUD) messages as discussed in <xref
          target="RFC6081"/><xref target="RFC4380"/> in order to keep NAT
          state alive as long as packets are still flowing.</t>

          <t>When an IP packet enters a Client's OMNI interface from the
          link-layer, if the destination matches one of the Client's MNPs or
          link-local addresses the Client reassembles and decapsulates as
          necessary and delivers the inner packet to the network layer.
          Otherwise, the Client drops the packet and MAY return a
          network-layer ICMP Destination Unreachable message subject to rate
          limiting (see: <xref target="aeroerr"/>).</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="pforw" title="Proxy Forwarding Algorithm">
          <t>For control messages originating from or destined to a Client,
          the Proxy intercepts the message and updates its proxy neighbor
          cache entry for the Client. The Proxy then forwards a (proxyed) copy
          of the control message. (For example, the Proxy forwards a proxyed
          version of a Client's NS/RS message to the target neighbor, and
          forwards a proxyed version of the neighbor's NA/RA reply to the
          Client.)</t>

          <t>When the Proxy receives a data packet from a Client within the
          ANET, the Proxy reassembles and re-fragments if necessary then
          searches for an asymmetric neighbor cache entry that matches the
          destination and forwards as follows:<list style="symbols">
              <t>if the destination matches an asymmetric neighbor cache
              entry, the Proxy uses one or more "reachable" neighbor
              interfaces in the entry for packet forwarding using OAL/ORH
              encapsulation if necessary according to the cached link-layer
              address information. If the neighbor interface is in a different
              OMNI link segment, the Proxy forwards the packet to a Bridge;
              otherwise, it forwards the packet directly to the neighbor. If
              the neighbor is behind a NAT, the Proxy instead forwards initial
              packets via a Bridge while sending an NS(NUD) to the neighbor.
              When the Proxy receives the NA(NUD), it can begin forwarding
              packets directly to the neighbor the same as discussed in <xref
              target="cforw"/> while sending additional NUD messages as
              necessary to maintain NAT state. Note that no direct bubbles are
              necessary since the Proxy is by definition not located behind a
              NAT.</t>

              <t>else, the Proxy uses OAL/ORH encapsulation and forwards the
              packet to a Bridge while using the MNP-ULA corresponding to the
              packet's destination as the destination address.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>When the Proxy receives an encapsulated data packet from an INET
          neighbor or from a secured tunnel from a Bridge, it accepts the
          packet only if data origin authentication succeeds and if there is a
          proxy neighbor cache entry that matches the inner destination. Next,
          the Proxy reassembles the packet (if necessary) and continues
          processing. If the reassembly is complete and the neighbor cache
          state is REACHABLE, the Proxy then returns a PTB if necessary (see:
          <xref target="aeromtu"/>) then either drops or forwards the packet
          to the Client while performing OAL/ORH re-encapsulation and
          re-fragmentation if necessary. If the neighbor cache entry state is
          DEPARTED, the Proxy instead changes the destination address to the
          address of the new Server and forwards it to a Bridge while
          performing OAL/ORH re-encapsulation if necessary.</t>

          <t>Note: When the Proxy receives fragmented OAL packets with
          destination address set to the MNP-ULA of the Client, it can either
          reassemble first and then re-encapsulate/re-fragment before
          forwarding to the Client or forward the raw fragments on to the
          Client which then must reassemble. In the former case, the Proxy can
          re-fragment to a size that better matches the link MTU for the
          Client, which may be important for low-end links with large MTUs. In
          the latter case, the Client may receive fragments that are smaller
          than its link MTU but can still be reassembled; this case may
          provide an important performance benefit to Proxys by permitting
          them to avoid excessive reassembly and re-fragmentation
          overhead.)</t>

          <t>Note: If the Proxy has multiple IP packets to send to the same
          neighbor, it can concatenate them in a single super-packet as
          discussed in Section 5.2 of <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sforw" title="Server/Relay Forwarding Algorithm">
          <t>For control messages destined to a target Client's MNP-LLA that
          are received from a secured tunnel, the Server intercepts the
          message and returns a Proxyed response on behalf of the Client. (For
          example, the Server sends a Proxyed NA message reply in response to
          an NS message directed to one of its associated Clients.) If the
          Client's neighbor cache entry is in the DEPARTED state, however, the
          Server instead forwards the packet to the Client's new Server using
          OAL/ORH re-encapsulation the same as discussed for Proxys in <xref
          target="pforw"/>.</t>

          <t>When the Server receives an encapsulated data packet from an INET
          neighbor or from a secured tunnel, it accepts the packet only if
          data origin authentication succeeds. If the packet was an OAL
          fragment with destination set to the Server's ADM-ULA, the Server
          submits the packet for reassembly (if the destination was the
          MNP-ULA of one of its Clients, the Server instead either submits the
          packet for reassembly or forwards the fragment directly to the
          target Client). If reassembly is complete (or if no reassembly was
          required), the Server then (re)fragments if necessary and forwards
          as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>if the network layer destination matches a symmetric neighbor
              cache entry in the REACHABLE state the Server prepares the
              packet for forwarding to the destination Client. The Server then
              forwards the packet as specified in <xref
              target="aeromtu"/>.</t>

              <t>else, if the destination matches a symmetric neighbor cache
              entry in the DEPARETED state the Server re-encapsulates the
              packet and forwards it using the ADM-ULA of the Client's new
              Server as the destination.</t>

              <t>else, if the destination matches an asymmetric neighbor cache
              entry, the Server proceeds the same as specified for a Proxy in
              <xref target="pforw"/>. Again, the Server need not send direct
              bubbles since it is not located behind a NAT.</t>

              <t>else, if the destination matches a non-MNP route in the IP
              forwarding table or an ADM-LLA assigned to the Server's OMNI
              interface, the Server decapsulates the packet and releases it to
              the network layer for local delivery or IP forwarding.</t>

              <t>else, the Server drops the packet.</t>
            </list>When the Server's OMNI interface receives a data packet
          from the network layer or from a VPNed or Direct Client, it performs
          OAL/ORH encapsulation and fragmentation if necessary, then processes
          the packet according to the network-layer destination address as
          follows:<list style="symbols">
              <t>if the destination matches a symmetric or asymmetric neighbor
              cache entry the Server processes the packet as above.</t>

              <t>else, the Server encapsulates the packet in OLA/ORH headers
              and forwards it to a Bridge using its own ADM-ULA as the source
              and the MNP-ULA corresponding to the destination as the
              destination.</t>
            </list>Note: The same as for Proxys, when the Server receives
          fragmented OAL packets with destination address set to the MNP-ULA
          of the target, it can either reassemble first and then
          re-encapsulate/re-fragment before sending or forward the raw
          fragments on to the target which then must reassemble. In the former
          case, the Server can re-fragment to a size that better matches the
          link MTU for the Client, which may be important for low-end links
          with large MTUs. In the latter case, the target may receive
          fragments that are smaller than its link MTU but can still be
          reassembled; this case may provide an important performance benefit
          to Servers by permitting them to avoid excessive reassembly and
          re-fragmentation overhead.)</t>

          <t>Note: If the Server has multiple IP packets to send to the same
          neighbor, it can concatenate them in a single super-packet as
          discussed in Section 5.2 of <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="rforw" title="Bridge Forwarding Algorithm">
          <t>Bridges forward OAL/ORH-encapsulated packets over secured tunnels
          the same as any IP router. When the Bridge receives an
          OAL/ORH-encapsulated packet via a secured tunnel, it removes the
          outer INET header and searches for a forwarding table entry that
          matches the OAL destination address. The Bridge then processes the
          packet as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>if the destination matches its ADM-ULA Subnet Router Anycast
              address the Bridge processes the packet locally before
              forwarding. The Bridge drops the packet if the next header is
              not an ORH; otherwise, for NA(NUD) messages the Bridge replaces
              the OMNI option Interface Attributes sub-option with information
              for its own interface while retaining the ifIndex value supplied
              by the NA(NUD) message source. For all packet types, the Bridge
              next examines the ORH FMT code. If the code indicates the
              destination is a Client on the open INET (or, a Client behind a
              NAT for which NAT traversal procedures have already converged)
              the Bridge removes the ORH then writes the MNP-ULA formed from
              the ORH Destination Suffix into the OAL destination if the
              packet is a fragment (otherwise, the Bridge also removes the OAL
              header). The Bridge then forwards the packet/fragment via INET
              encapsulation to the ORH L2ADDR. For all other destination
              cases, the Bridge instead writes the ADM-ULA formed from the ORH
              SRT/LHS into the OAL destination address and forwards the
              OAL/ORH encapsulated packet to the ADM-ULA Server while invoking
              NAT traversal procedures the same as for Proxys and Servers if
              necessary, noting that no direct bubbles are necessary since
              only the Client and not the Bridge is behind a NAT.</t>

              <t>else, if the destination matches one of the Bridge's own
              addresses, the Bridge submits the packet for local delivery.</t>

              <t>else, if the destination matches a forwarding table entry the
              Bridge forwards the packet via a secured tunnel to the next hop.
              If the destination matches an MSP without matching an MNP,
              however, the Bridge instead drops the packet and returns an ICMP
              Destination Unreachable message subject to rate limiting (see:
              <xref target="aeroerr"/>).</t>

              <t>else, the Bridge drops the packet and returns an ICMP
              Destination Unreachable as above.</t>
            </list>As for any IP router, the Bridge decrements the TTL/Hop
          Limit when it forwards the packet. Therefore, when an OAL header is
          present only the Hop Limit in the OAL header is decremented and not
          the TTL/Hop Limit in the inner packet header. Bridges do not insert
          OAL/ORH headers themselves; instead, they act as IPv6 routers and
          forward packets based on the destination address found in the
          headers of packets they receive.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroerr" title="OMNI Interface Error Handling">
        <t>When an AERO node admits a packet into the OMNI interface, it may
        receive link-layer or network-layer error indications.</t>

        <t>A link-layer error indication is an ICMP error message generated by
        a router in the INET on the path to the neighbor or by the neighbor
        itself. The message includes an IP header with the address of the node
        that generated the error as the source address and with the link-layer
        address of the AERO node as the destination address.</t>

        <t>The IP header is followed by an ICMP header that includes an error
        Type, Code and Checksum. Valid type values include "Destination
        Unreachable", "Time Exceeded" and "Parameter Problem" <xref
        target="RFC0792"/><xref target="RFC4443"/>. (OMNI interfaces ignore
        all link-layer IPv4 "Fragmentation Needed" and IPv6 "Packet Too Big"
        messages since they only emit packets that are guaranteed to be no
        larger than the IP minimum link MTU as discussed in <xref
        target="aeromtu"/>.)</t>

        <t>The ICMP header is followed by the leading portion of the packet
        that generated the error, also known as the "packet-in-error". For
        ICMPv6, <xref target="RFC4443"/> specifies that the packet-in-error
        includes: "As much of invoking packet as possible without the ICMPv6
        packet exceeding the minimum IPv6 MTU" (i.e., no more than 1280
        bytes). For ICMPv4, <xref target="RFC0792"/> specifies that the
        packet-in-error includes: "Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data
        Datagram", however <xref target="RFC1812"/> Section 4.3.2.3 updates
        this specification by stating: "the ICMP datagram SHOULD contain as
        much of the original datagram as possible without the length of the
        ICMP datagram exceeding 576 bytes".</t>

        <t>The link-layer error message format is shown in <xref
        target="icmp2err"/> (where, "L2" and "L3" refer to link-layer and
        network-layer, respectively):</t>

        <t><figure anchor="icmp2err"
            title="OMNI Interface Link-Layer Error Message Format">
            <artwork><![CDATA[     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~                               ~
     |        L2 IP Header of        |
     |         error message         |
     ~                               ~
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |         L2 ICMP Header        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ---
     ~                               ~   P
     |   IP and other encapsulation  |   a
     | headers of original L3 packet |   c
     ~                               ~   k
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   e
     ~                               ~   t
     |        IP header of           |   
     |      original L3 packet       |   i
     ~                               ~   n
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   
     ~                               ~   e
     |    Upper layer headers and    |   r
     |    leading portion of body    |   r
     |   of the original L3 packet   |   o
     ~                               ~   r
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ---
]]></artwork>
          </figure>The AERO node rules for processing these link-layer error
        messages are as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>When an AERO node receives a link-layer Parameter Problem
            message, it processes the message the same as described as for
            ordinary ICMP errors in the normative references <xref
            target="RFC0792"/><xref target="RFC4443"/>.</t>

            <t>When an AERO node receives persistent link-layer Time Exceeded
            messages, the IP ID field may be wrapping before earlier fragments
            awaiting reassembly have been processed. In that case, the node
            should begin including integrity checks and/or institute rate
            limits for subsequent packets.</t>

            <t>When an AERO node receives persistent link-layer Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to encapsulated packets that it
            sends to one of its asymmetric neighbor correspondents, the node
            should process the message as an indication that a path may be
            failing, and optionally initiate NUD over that path. If it
            receives Destination Unreachable messages over multiple paths, the
            node should allow future packets destined to the correspondent to
            flow through a default route and re-initiate route
            optimization.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Client receives persistent link-layer Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to encapsulated packets that it
            sends to one of its symmetric neighbor Servers, the Client should
            mark the path as unusable and use another path. If it receives
            Destination Unreachable messages on many or all paths, the Client
            should associate with a new Server and release its association
            with the old Server as specified in <xref target="newsrv"/>.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Server receives persistent link-layer Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to encapsulated packets that it
            sends to one of its symmetric neighbor Clients, the Server should
            mark the underlying path as unusable and use another underlying
            path.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Server or Proxy receives link-layer Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to an encapsulated packet that it
            sends to one of its permanent neighbors, it treats the messages as
            an indication that the path to the neighbor may be failing.
            However, the dynamic routing protocol should soon reconverge and
            correct the temporary outage.</t>
          </list>When an AERO Bridge receives a packet for which the
        network-layer destination address is covered by an MSP, the Bridge
        drops the packet if there is no more-specific routing information for
        the destination and returns a network-layer Destination Unreachable
        message subject to rate limiting. The Bridge writes the network-layer
        source address of the original packet as the destination address and
        uses one of its non link-local addresses as the source address of the
        message.</t>

        <t>When an AERO node receives an encapsulated packet for which the
        reassembly buffer it too small, it drops the packet and returns a
        network-layer Packet Too Big (PTB) message. The node first writes the
        MRU value into the PTB message MTU field, writes the network-layer
        source address of the original packet as the destination address and
        writes one of its non link-local addresses as the source address.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeropd"
               title="AERO Router Discovery, Prefix Delegation and Autoconfiguration">
        <t>AERO Router Discovery, Prefix Delegation and Autoconfiguration are
        coordinated as discussed in the following Sections.</t>

        <section anchor="aeropd-dhcp" title="AERO Service Model">
          <t>Each AERO Server on the OMNI link is configured to facilitate
          Client prefix delegation/registration requests. Each Server is
          provisioned with a database of MNP-to-Client ID mappings for all
          Clients enrolled in the AERO service, as well as any information
          necessary to authenticate each Client. The Client database is
          maintained by a central administrative authority for the OMNI link
          and securely distributed to all Servers, e.g., via the Lightweight
          Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) <xref target="RFC4511"/>, via
          static configuration, etc. Clients receive the same service
          regardless of the Servers they select.</t>

          <t>AERO Clients and Servers use ND messages to maintain neighbor
          cache entries. AERO Servers configure their OMNI interfaces as
          advertising NBMA interfaces, and therefore send unicast RA messages
          with a short Router Lifetime value (e.g., ReachableTime seconds) in
          response to a Client's RS message. Thereafter, Clients send
          additional RS messages to keep Server state alive.</t>

          <t>AERO Clients and Servers include prefix delegation and/or
          registration parameters in RS/RA messages (see <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>). The ND messages are
          exchanged between Client and Server according to the prefix
          management schedule required by the service. If the Client knows its
          MNP in advance, it can employ prefix registration by including its
          MNP-LLA as the source address of an RS message and with an OMNI
          option with valid prefix registration information for the MNP. If
          the Server (and Proxy) accept the Client's MNP assertion, they
          inject the prefix into the routing system and establish the
          necessary neighbor cache state. If the Client does not have a
          pre-assigned MNP, it can instead employ prefix delegation by
          including the unspecified address (::) as the source address of an
          RS message and with an OMNI option with a DHCPv6 message option to
          request an MNP.</t>

          <t>The following sections specify the Client and Server
          behavior.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="aeropd-client" title="AERO Client Behavior">
          <t>AERO Clients discover the addresses of Servers in a similar
          manner as described in <xref target="RFC5214"/>. Discovery methods
          include static configuration (e.g., from a flat-file map of Server
          addresses and locations), or through an automated means such as
          Domain Name System (DNS) name resolution <xref target="RFC1035"/>.
          Alternatively, the Client can discover Server addresses through a
          layer 2 data link login exchange, or through a unicast RA response
          to a multicast/anycast RS as described below. In the absence of
          other information, the Client can resolve the DNS Fully-Qualified
          Domain Name (FQDN) "linkupnetworks.[domainname]" where
          "linkupnetworks" is a constant text string and "[domainname]" is a
          DNS suffix for the OMNI link (e.g., "example.com").</t>

          <t>To associate with a Server, the Client acts as a requesting
          router to request MNPs. The Client prepares an RS message with
          prefix management parameters and includes a Nonce and Timestamp
          option if the Client needs to correlate RA replies. If the Client
          already knows the Server's ADM-LLA, it includes the LLA as the
          network-layer destination address; otherwise, the Client includes
          the (link-local) All-Routers multicast as the network-layer
          destination. If the Client already knows its own MNP-LLA, it can use
          the MNP-LLA as the network-layer source address and include an OMNI
          option with prefix registration information. Otherwise, the Client
          uses the unspecified address (::) as the network-layer source
          address and includes a DHCPv6 sub-option in the OMNI option (see:
          <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>). The Client
          includes Interface Attributes corresponding to the underlying
          interface over which it will send the RS message, and MAY include
          additional Interface Attributes specific to other underlying
          interfaces.</t>

          <t>The Client then sends the RS message (either directly via Direct
          interfaces, via a VPN for VPNed interfaces, via a Proxy for ANET
          interfaces or via INET encapsulation for INET interfaces) while
          using OAL encapsulation/fragmentation if necessary, then waits for
          an RA message reply (see <xref target="aeropd-server"/>). The Client
          retries up to MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS times until an RA is received.
          If the Client receives no RAs, or if it receives an RA with Router
          Lifetime set to 0, the Client SHOULD abandon this Server and try
          another Server. Otherwise, the Client processes the prefix
          information found in the RA message.</t>

          <t>When the Client processes an RA, it first performs OAL reassembly
          if necessary then creates a symmetric neighbor cache entry with the
          Server's ADM-LLA as the network-layer address and the Server's
          encapsulation and/or link-layer addresses as the link-layer address.
          The Client next records the RA Router Lifetime field value in the
          neighbor cache entry as the time for which the Server has committed
          to maintaining the MNP in the routing system via this underlying
          interface, and caches the other RA configuration information
          including Cur Hop Limit, M and O flags, Reachable Time and Retrans
          Timer. The Client then autoconfigures MNP-LLAs for any delegated
          MNPs and assigns them to the OMNI interface. The Client also caches
          any MSPs included in Route Information Options (RIOs) <xref
          target="RFC4191"/> as MSPs to associate with the OMNI link, and
          assigns the MTU value in the MTU option to the underlying
          interface.</t>

          <t>The Client then registers additional underlying interfaces with
          the Server by sending RS messages via each additional interface as
          described above. The RS messages include the same parameters as for
          the initial RS/RA exchange, but with destination address set to the
          Server's ADM-LLA. The Client finally sub-delegates the MNPs to its
          attached EUNs and/or the Client's own internal virtual interfaces as
          described in <xref target="I-D.templin-v6ops-pdhost"/> to support
          the Client's downstream attached "Internet of Things (IoT)". The
          Client then sends additional RS messages over each underlying
          interface before the Router Lifetime received for that interface
          expires.</t>

          <t>After the Client registers its underlying interfaces, it may wish
          to change one or more registrations, e.g., if an interface changes
          address or becomes unavailable, if QoS preferences change, etc. To
          do so, the Client prepares an RS message to send over any available
          underlying interface as above. The RS includes an OMNI option with
          prefix registration/delegation information, with Interface
          Attributes specific to the selected underlying interface, and with
          any additional Interface Attributes specific to other underlying
          interfaces. When the Client receives the Server's RA response, it
          has assurance that the Server has been updated with the new
          information.</t>

          <t>If the Client wishes to discontinue use of a Server it issues an
          RS message over any underlying interface with an OMNI option with a
          prefix release indication. When the Server processes the message, it
          releases the MNP, sets the symmetric neighbor cache entry state for
          the Client to DEPARTED and returns an RA reply with Router Lifetime
          set to 0. After a short delay (e.g., 2 seconds), the Server
          withdraws the MNP from the routing system.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="aeropd-server" title="AERO Server Behavior">
          <t>AERO Servers act as IP routers and support a prefix
          delegation/registration service for Clients. Servers arrange to add
          their ADM-LLAs to a static map of Server addresses for the link
          and/or the DNS resource records for the FQDN
          "linkupnetworks.[domainname]" before entering service. Server
          addresses should be geographically and/or topologically referenced,
          and made available for discovery by Clients on the OMNI link.</t>

          <t>When a Server receives a prospective Client's RS message on its
          OMNI interface, it SHOULD return an immediate RA reply with Router
          Lifetime set to 0 if it is currently too busy or otherwise unable to
          service the Client. Otherwise, the Server performs OAL reassembly on
          the RS message if necessary, then authenticates the message and
          processes the prefix delegation/registration parameters. The Server
          first determines the correct MNPs to provide to the Client by
          processing the MNP-LLA prefix parameters and/or the DHCPv6 OMNI
          sub-option. When the Server returns the MNPs, it also creates a
          forwarding table entry for the MNP-ULA corresponding to each MNP so
          that the MNPs are propagated into the routing system (see: <xref
          target="scaling"/>). For IPv6, the Server creates an IPv6 forwarding
          table entry for each MNP. For IPv4, the Server creates an IPv6
          forwarding table entry with the IPv4-compatibility MNP-ULA prefix
          corresponding to the IPv4 address.</t>

          <t>The Server next creates a symmetric neighbor cache entry for the
          Client using the base MNP-LLA as the network-layer address and with
          lifetime set to no more than the smallest prefix lifetime. Next, the
          Server updates the neighbor cache entry by recording the information
          in each Interface Attributes sub-option in the RS OMNI option. The
          Server also records the actual OAL/INET addresses in the neighbor
          cache entry.</t>

          <t>Next, the Server prepares an RA message using its ADM-LLA as the
          network-layer source address and the network-layer source address of
          the RS message as the network-layer destination address. The Server
          sets the Router Lifetime to the time for which it will maintain both
          this underlying interface individually and the symmetric neighbor
          cache entry as a whole. The Server also sets Cur Hop Limit, M and O
          flags, Reachable Time and Retrans Timer to values appropriate for
          the OMNI link. The Server includes the MNPs, any other prefix
          management parameters and an OMNI option with no Interface
          Attributes. The Server then includes one or more RIOs that encode
          the MSPs for the OMNI link, plus an MTU option (see <xref
          target="aeromtu"/>). The Server finally forwards the message to the
          Client using OAL/INET, INET, or NULL encapsulation and OAL
          fragmentation as necessary.</t>

          <t>After the initial RS/RA exchange, the Server maintains a
          ReachableTime timer for each of the Client's underlying interfaces
          individually (and for the Client's symmetric neighbor cache entry
          collectively) set to expire after ReachableTime seconds. If the
          Client (or Proxy) issues additional RS messages, the Server sends an
          RA response and resets ReachableTime. If the Server receives an ND
          message with a prefix release indication it sets the Client's
          symmetric neighbor cache entry to the DEPARTED state and withdraws
          the MNP from the routing system after a short delay (e.g., 2
          seconds). If ReachableTime expires before a new RS is received on an
          individual underlying interface, the Server marks the interface as
          DOWN. If ReachableTime expires before any new RS is received on any
          individual underlying interface, the Server sets the symmetric
          neighbor cache entry state to STALE and sets a 10 second timer. If
          the Server has not received a new RS or ND message with a prefix
          release indication before the 10 second timer expires, it deletes
          the neighbor cache entry and withdraws the MNP from the routing
          system.</t>

          <t>The Server processes any ND messages pertaining to the Client and
          returns an NA/RA reply in response to solicitations. The Server may
          also issue unsolicited RA messages, e.g., with reconfigure
          parameters to cause the Client to renegotiate its prefix
          delegation/registrations, with Router Lifetime set to 0 if it can no
          longer service this Client, etc. Finally, If the symmetric neighbor
          cache entry is in the DEPARTED state, the Server deletes the entry
          after DepartTime expires.</t>

          <t>Note: Clients SHOULD notify former Servers of their departures,
          but Servers are responsible for expiring neighbor cache entries and
          withdrawing routes even if no departure notification is received
          (e.g., if the Client leaves the network unexpectedly). Servers
          SHOULD therefore set Router Lifetime to ReachableTime seconds in
          solicited RA messages to minimize persistent stale cache information
          in the absence of Client departure notifications. A short Router
          Lifetime also ensures that proactive Client/Server RS/RA messaging
          will keep any NAT state alive (see above).</t>

          <t>Note: All Servers on an OMNI link MUST advertise consistent
          values in the RA Cur Hop Limit, M and O flags, Reachable Time and
          Retrans Timer fields the same as for any link, since unpredictable
          behavior could result if different Servers on the same link
          advertised different values.</t>

          <section title="DHCPv6-Based Prefix Registration">
            <t>When a Client is not pre-provisioned with an MNP-LLA, it will
            need for the Server to select one or more MNPs on its behalf and
            set up the correct state in the AERO routing service. (A Client
            with a pre-provisioned MNP may also request the Server to select
            additional MNPs.) The DHCPv6 service <xref target="RFC8415"/> is
            used to support this requirement.</t>

            <t>When a Client needs to have the Server select MNPs, it sends an
            RS message with source address set to the unspecified address (::)
            and with an OMNI option that includes a DHCPv6 message sub-option
            with DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation (DHCPv6-PD) parameters. When the
            Server receives the RS message, it extracts the DHCPv6-PD message
            from the OMNI option.</t>

            <t>The Server then acts as a "Proxy DHCPv6 Client" in a message
            exchange with the locally-resident DHCPv6 server, which delegates
            MNPs and returns a DHCPv6-PD Reply message. (If the Server wishes
            to defer creation of MN state until the DHCPv6-PD Reply is
            received, it can instead act as a Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent
            per <xref target="RFC6221"/> by encapsulating the DHCPv6-PD
            message in a Relay-forward/reply exchange with Relay Message and
            Interface ID options.)</t>

            <t>When the Server receives the DHCPv6-PD Reply, it adds a route
            to the routing system and creates an MNP-LLA based on the
            delegated MNP. The Server then sends an RA back to the Client with
            the (newly-created) MNP-LLA as the destination address and with
            the DHCPv6-PD Reply message coded in the OMNI option. When the
            Client receives the RA, it creates a default route, assigns the
            Subnet Router Anycast address and sets its MNP-LLA based on the
            delegated MNP.</t>
          </section>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aero-proxy" title="The AERO Proxy">
        <t>Clients may connect to protected-spectrum ANETs that employ
        physical and/or link-layer security services to facilitate
        communications to Servers in outside INETs. In that case, the ANET can
        employ an AERO Proxy. The Proxy is located at the ANET/INET border and
        listens for RS messages originating from or RA messages destined to
        ANET Clients. The Proxy acts on these control messages as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>when the Proxy receives an RS message from a new ANET Client,
            it first authenticates the message then examines the network-layer
            destination address. If the destination address is a Server's
            ADM-LLA, the Proxy proceeds to the next step. Otherwise, if the
            destination is (link-local) All-Routers multicast, the Proxy
            selects a "nearby" Server that is likely to be a good candidate to
            serve the Client and replaces the destination address with the
            Server's ADM-LLA. Next, the Proxy creates a proxy neighbor cache
            entry and caches the Client and Server link-layer addresses along
            with the OMNI option information and any other identifying
            information including Transaction IDs, Client Identifiers, Nonce
            values, etc. The Proxy finally encapsulates the (proxyed) RS
            message in an OAL header with source set to the Proxy's ADM-ULA
            and destination set to the Server's ADM-ULA. The Proxy also
            includes an OMNI header with an Interface Attributes option that
            includes its own INET address plus a unique Port Number for this
            Client, then forwards the message into the OMNI link spanning
            tree. (Note: including a unique Port Number allows the Server to
            distinguish different Clients located behind the same Proxy at the
            link-layer, whereas the link-layer addresses would otherwise be
            indistinguishable)</t>

            <t>when the Server receives the RS, it authenticates the message
            then creates or updates a symmetric neighbor cache entry for the
            Client with the Proxy's ADM-ULA, INET address and Port Number as
            the link-layer address information. The Server then sends an RA
            message back to the Proxy via the spanning tree.</t>

            <t>when the Proxy receives the RA, it authenticates the message
            and matches it with the proxy neighbor cache entry created by the
            RS. The Proxy then caches the prefix information as a mapping from
            the Client's MNPs to the Client's link-layer address, caches the
            Server's advertised Router Lifetime and sets the neighbor cache
            entry state to REACHABLE. The Proxy then optionally rewrites the
            Router Lifetime and forwards the (proxyed) message to the Client.
            The Proxy finally includes an MTU option (if necessary) with an
            MTU to use for the underlying ANET interface.</t>
          </list>After the initial RS/RA exchange, the Proxy forwards any
        Client data packets for which there is no matching asymmetric neighbor
        cache entry to a Bridge using OAL encapsulation with its own ADM-ULA
        as the source and the MNP-ULA corresponding to the Client as the
        destination. The Proxy instead forwards any Client data destined to an
        asymmetric neighbor cache target directly to the target according to
        the OAL/link-layer information - the process of establishing
        asymmetric neighbor cache entries is specified in <xref
        target="predirect"/>.</t>

        <t>While the Client is still attached to the ANET, the Proxy sends NS,
        RS and/or unsolicited NA messages to update the Server's symmetric
        neighbor cache entries on behalf of the Client and/or to convey QoS
        updates. This allows for higher-frequency Proxy-initiated RS/RA
        messaging over well-connected INET infrastructure supplemented by
        lower-frequency Client-initiated RS/RA messaging over constrained ANET
        data links.</t>

        <t>If the Server ceases to send solicited advertisements, the Proxy
        sends unsolicited RAs on the ANET interface with destination set to
        (link-local) All-Nodes multicast and with Router Lifetime set to zero
        to inform Clients that the Server has failed. Although the Proxy
        engages in ND exchanges on behalf of the Client, the Client can also
        send ND messages on its own behalf, e.g., if it is in a better
        position than the Proxy to convey QoS changes, etc. For this reason,
        the Proxy marks any Client-originated solicitation messages (e.g. by
        inserting a Nonce option) so that it can return the solicited
        advertisement to the Client instead of processing it locally.</t>

        <t>If the Client becomes unreachable, the Proxy sets the neighbor
        cache entry state to DEPARTED and retains the entry for DepartTime
        seconds. While the state is DEPARTED, the Proxy forwards any packets
        destined to the Client to a Bridge via OAL/ORH encapsulation. When
        DepartTime expires, the Proxy deletes the neighbor cache entry and
        discards any further packets destined to this (now forgotten)
        Client.</t>

        <t>In some ANETs that employ a Proxy, the Client's MNP can be injected
        into the ANET routing system. In that case, the Client can send data
        messages without encapsulation so that the ANET routing system
        transports the unencapsulated packets to the Proxy. This can be very
        beneficial, e.g., if the Client connects to the ANET via low-end data
        links such as some aviation wireless links.</t>

        <t>If the first-hop ANET access router is on the same underlying link
        and recognizes the AERO/OMNI protocol, the Client can avoid
        encapsulation for both its control and data messages. When the Client
        connects to the link, it can send an unencapsulated RS message with
        source address set to its own MNP-LLA (or to a Temporary LLA), and
        with destination address set to the ADM-LLA of the Client's selected
        Server or to (link-local) All-Routers multicast. The Client includes
        an OMNI option formatted as specified in <xref
        target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>.</t>

        <t>The Client then sends the unencapsulated RS message, which will be
        intercepted by the AERO-Aware access router. The access router then
        encapsulates the RS message in an ANET header with its own address as
        the source address and the address of a Proxy as the destination
        address. The access router further remembers the address of the Proxy
        so that it can encapsulate future data packets from the Client via the
        same Proxy. If the access router needs to change to a new Proxy, it
        simply sends another RS message toward the Server via the new Proxy on
        behalf of the Client.</t>

        <t>In some cases, the access router and Proxy may be one and the same
        node. In that case, the node would be located on the same physical
        link as the Client, but its message exchanges with the Server would
        need to pass through a security gateway at the ANET/INET border. The
        method for deploying access routers and Proxys (i.e. as a single node
        or multiple nodes) is an ANET-local administrative consideration.</t>

        <t>Note: The Proxy can apply packing as discussed in Section 5.2 of
        <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> if an opportunity
        arises to concatenate multiple payload packets that will be destined
        to the same neighbor.</t>

        <section anchor="servprox" title="Combined Proxy/Servers">
          <t>Clients may need to connect directly to Servers via INET, Direct
          and VPNed interfaces (i.e., non-ANET interfaces). If the Client's
          underlying interfaces all connect via the same INET partition, then
          it can connect to a single controlling Server via all
          interfaces.</t>

          <t>If some Client interfaces connect via different INET partitions,
          however, the Client still selects a set of controlling Servers and
          sends RS messages via their directly-connected Servers while using
          the ADM-LLA of the controlling Server as the destination.</t>

          <t>When a Server receives an RS with destination set to the ADM-LLA
          of a controlling Server, it acts as a Proxy to forward the message
          to the controlling Server while forwarding the corresponding RA
          reply to the Client.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="pulse"
                 title="Detecting and Responding to Server Failures">
          <t>In environments where fast recovery from Server failure is
          required, Proxys SHOULD use proactive Neighbor Unreachability
          Detection (NUD) to track Server reachability in a similar fashion as
          for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) <xref
          target="RFC5880"/>. Proxys can then quickly detect and react to
          failures so that cached information is re-established through
          alternate paths. The NUD control messaging is carried only over
          well-connected ground domain networks (i.e., and not low-end
          aeronautical radio links) and can therefore be tuned for rapid
          response.</t>

          <t>Proxys perform proactive NUD with Servers for which there are
          currently active ANET Clients by sending continuous NS messages in
          rapid succession, e.g., one message per second. The Proxy sends the
          NS message via the spanning tree with the Proxy's ADM-LLA as the
          source and the ADM-LLA of the Server as the destination. When the
          Proxy is also sending RS messages to the Server on behalf of ANET
          Clients, the resulting RA responses can be considered as equivalent
          hints of forward progress. This means that the Proxy need not also
          send a periodic NS if it has already sent an RS within the same
          period. If the Server fails (i.e., if the Proxy ceases to receive
          advertisements), the Proxy can quickly inform Clients by sending
          multicast RA messages on the ANET interface.</t>

          <t>The Proxy sends RA messages on the ANET interface with source
          address set to the Server's address, destination address set to
          (link-local) All-Nodes multicast, and Router Lifetime set to 0. The
          Proxy SHOULD send MAX_FINAL_RTR_ADVERTISEMENTS RA messages separated
          by small delays <xref target="RFC4861"/>. Any Clients on the ANET
          that had been using the failed Server will receive the RA messages
          and associate with a new Server.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="multi-server"
                 title="Point-to-Multipoint Server Coordination">
          <t>In environments where Client messaging over ANETs is
          bandwidth-limited and/or expensive, Clients can enlist the services
          of the Proxy to coordinate with multiple Servers in a single RS/RA
          message exchange. The Client can send a single RS message to
          (link-local) All-Routers multicast that includes the ID's of
          multiple Servers in MS-Register sub-options of the OMNI option.</t>

          <t>When the Proxy receives the RS and processes the OMNI option, it
          sends a separate RS to each MS-Register Server ID. When the Proxy
          receives an RA, it can optionally return an immediate "singleton" RA
          to the Client or record the Server's ID for inclusion in a pending
          "aggregate" RA message. The Proxy can then return aggregate RA
          messages to the Client including multiple Server IDs in order to
          conserve bandwidth. Each RA includes a proper subset of the Server
          IDs from the original RS message, and the Proxy must ensure that the
          message contents of each RA are consistent with the information
          received from the (aggregated) Servers.</t>

          <t>Clients can thereafter employ efficient point-to-multipoint
          Server coordination under the assistance of the Proxy to reduce the
          number of messages sent over the ANET while enlisting the support of
          multiple Servers for fault tolerance. Clients can further include
          MS-Release sub-options in IPv6 ND messages to request the Proxy to
          release from former Servers via the procedures discussed in <xref
          target="newsrv"/>.</t>

          <t>The OMNI interface specification <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> provides further
          discussion of the Client/Proxy RS/RA messaging involved in
          point-to-multipoint coordination.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="predirect"
               title="AERO Route Optimization / Address Resolution">
        <t>While data packets are flowing between a source and target node,
        route optimization SHOULD be used. Route optimization is initiated by
        the first eligible Route Optimization Source (ROS) closest to the
        source as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>For Clients on VPNed and Direct interfaces, the Server is the
            ROS.</t>

            <t>For Clients on ANET interfaces, the Proxy is the ROS.</t>

            <t>For Clients on INET interfaces, the Client itself is the
            ROS.</t>

            <t>For correspondent nodes on INET/EUN interfaces serviced by a
            Relay, the Relay is the ROS.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>The route optimization procedure is conducted between the ROS and
        the target Server/Relay acting as a Route Optimization Responder (ROR)
        in the same manner as for IPv6 ND Address Resolution and using the
        same NS/NA messaging. The target may either be a MNP Client serviced
        by a Server, or a non-MNP correspondent reachable via a Relay.</t>

        <t>The procedures are specified in the following sections.</t>

        <section anchor="sendns" title="Route Optimization Initiation">
          <t>While data packets are flowing from the source node toward a
          target node, the ROS performs address resolution by sending an NS
          message for Address Resolution (NS(AR)) to receive a solicited
          NA(AR) message from the ROR. When the ROS sends an NS(AR), it
          includes:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>the LLA of the ROS as the source address.</t>

              <t>the data packet's destination as the Target Address.</t>

              <t>the Solicited-Node multicast address <xref target="RFC4291"/>
              formed from the lower 24 bits of the data packet's destination
              as the destination address, e.g., for 2001:db8:1:2::10:2000 the
              NS destination address is ff02:0:0:0:0:1:ff10:2000.</t>
            </list>The NS(AR) message includes an OMNI option with no
          Interface Attributes, such that the target will not create a
          neighbor cache entry. The Prefix Length in the OMNI option is set to
          the Prefix Length associated with the ROS's LLA.</t>

          <t>The ROS then encapsulates the NS(AR) message in an OAL header
          with source set to its own ULA and destination set to the MNP-ULA
          corresponding to the target, then sends the message into the
          spanning tree without decrementing the network-layer TTL/Hop Limit
          field. (When the ROS is a Client, it instead securely sends the
          NS(AR) to one of its current Servers as specified in <xref
          target="crazyclient"/>. The Server then forwards an adapted version
          of the NS(AR) into the spanning tree on behalf of the Client.)</t>

          <t>Note: The ROS can apply packing as discussed in Section 5.2 of
          <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> to concatenate the
          NS(AR) onto the same OAL packet used to carry one or more data
          packets that triggered route optimization.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="relayns" title="Relaying the NS(AR)">
          <t>When the Bridge receives the NS(AR) message from the ROS, it
          discards the INET header and determines that the ROR is the next hop
          by consulting its standard IPv6 forwarding table for the OAL header
          destination address. The Bridge then forwards the message toward the
          ROR via the spanning tree the same as for any IPv6 router. The
          final-hop Bridge in the spanning tree will deliver the message via a
          secured tunnel to the ROR.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="nsna"
                 title="Processing the NS(AR) and Sending the NA(AR)">
          <t>When the ROR receives the NS(AR) message, it examines the Target
          Address to determine whether it has a neighbor cache entry and/or
          route that matches the target. If there is no match, the ROR drops
          the message. Otherwise, the ROR continues processing as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>if the target belongs to an MNP Client neighbor in the
              DEPARTED state the ROR changes the NS(AR) message OAL
              destination address to the ADM-ULA of the Client's new Server,
              forwards the message into the spanning tree and returns from
              processing.</t>

              <t>If the target belongs to an MNP Client neighbor in the
              REACHABLE state, the ROR instead adds the AERO source address to
              the target Client's Report List with time set to ReportTime.</t>

              <t>If the target belongs to a non-MNP route, the ROR continues
              processing without adding an entry to the Report List.</t>
            </list>The ROR then prepares a (solicited) NA(AR) message to send
          back to the ROS but does not create a neighbor cache entry. The ROR
          sets the NA(AR) source address to the MNP-LLA corresponding to the
          target, sets the Target Address to the target of the solicitation,
          and sets the destination address to the source of the solicitation.
          The ROR then includes an OMNI option with Prefix Length set to the
          length associated with the MNP-LLA.</t>

          <t>If the target is an MNP Client, the ROR next includes Interface
          Attributes in the OMNI option for each of the target Client's
          underlying interfaces with current information for each interface
          and with the S/T-ifIndex field in the OMNI header set to 0 to
          indicate that the message originated from the ROR and not the
          Client.</t>

          <t>For each Interface Attributes sub-option, the ROR sets the L2ADDR
          according to its own INET address for VPNed or Direct interfaces, to
          the INET address of the Proxy or to the Client's INET address for
          INET interfaces. The ROR then includes the lower 32 bits of its own
          ADM-ULA (or the ADM-ULA of the Proxy) as the LHS, encodes the
          ADM-ULA prefix length code in the SRT field and sets the FMT code
          accordingly as specified in <xref target="interface"/>.</t>

          <t>The ROR then sets the NA(AR) message R flag to 1 (as a router), S
          flag to 1 (as a response to a solicitation), and O flag to 0 (as a
          proxy). The ROR finally encapsulates the NA(AR) message in an OAL
          header with source set to its own ULA and destination set to the
          source ULA of the NS(AR) message, then forwards the message into the
          spanning tree without decrementing the network-layer TTL/Hop Limit
          field.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="relayna" title="Relaying the NA(AR)">
          <t>When the Bridge receives the NA(AR) message from the ROR, it
          discards the INET header and determines that the ROS is the next hop
          by consulting its standard IPv6 forwarding table for the OAL header
          destination address. The Bridge then forwards the OAL-encapsulated
          NA(AR) message toward the ROS the same as for any IPv6 router. The
          final-hop Bridge in the spanning tree will deliver the message via a
          secured tunnel to the ROS.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="procna" title="Processing the NA(AR)">
          <t>When the ROS receives the NA(AR) message, it processes the
          message the same as for standard IPv6 Address Resolution <xref
          target="RFC4861"/>. In the process, it caches the source MNP-ULA
          then creates an asymmetric neighbor cache entry for the target and
          caches all information found in the OMNI option. The ROS finally
          sets the asymmetric neighbor cache entry lifetime to ReachableTime
          seconds. (When the ROS is a Client, the solicited NA(AR) message
          will first be delivered via the spanning tree to one of its current
          Servers, which then securely forwards the message to the Client as
          discussed in <xref target="crazyclient"/>.)</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="postro" title="Route Optimization Maintenance">
          <t>Following route optimization, the ROS forwards future data
          packets destined to the target via the addresses found in the cached
          link-layer information. The route optimization is shared by all
          sources that send packets to the target via the ROS, i.e., and not
          just the source on behalf of which the route optimization was
          initiated.</t>

          <t>While new data packets destined to the target are flowing through
          the ROS, it sends additional NS(AR) messages to the ROR before
          ReachableTime expires to receive a fresh NA(AR) message the same as
          described in the previous sections (route optimization refreshment
          strategies are an implementation matter, with a non-normative
          example given in <xref target="rorefresh"/>). The ROS uses the
          cached ADM-ULA of the ROR as the NS(AR) OAL destination address
          (i.e., instead of using the ULA corresponding to the target as was
          the case for the initial NS(AR)), and sends up to
          MAX_MULTICAST_SOLICIT NS(AR) messages separated by 1 second until an
          NA(AR) is received. If no NA(AR) is received, the ROS assumes that
          the current ROR has become unreachable and deletes the target
          neighbor cache entry. Subsequent data packets will trigger a new
          route optimization with an NS with OAL destination address set to
          the MNP-ULA corresponding to the target per <xref target="sendns"/>
          to discover a new ROR while initial data packets travel over a
          suboptimal route.</t>

          <t>If an NA(AR) is received, the ROS then updates the asymmetric
          neighbor cache entry to refresh ReachableTime, while (for MNP
          destinations) the ROR adds or updates the ROS address to the
          target's Report List and with time set to ReportTime. While no data
          packets are flowing, the ROS instead allows ReachableTime for the
          asymmetric neighbor cache entry to expire. When ReachableTime
          expires, the ROS deletes the asymmetric neighbor cache entry. Any
          future data packets flowing through the ROS will again trigger a new
          route optimization.</t>

          <t>The ROS may also receive unsolicited NA messages from the ROR at
          any time (see: <xref target="aeromob"/>). If there is an asymmetric
          neighbor cache entry for the target, the ROS updates the link-layer
          information but does not update ReachableTime since the receipt of
          an unsolicited NA does not confirm that any forward paths are
          working. If there is no asymmetric neighbor cache entry, the ROS
          simply discards the unsolicited NA.</t>

          <t>In this arrangement, the ROS holds an asymmetric neighbor cache
          entry for the target via the ROR, but the ROR does not hold an
          asymmetric neighbor cache entry for the ROS. The route optimization
          neighbor relationship is therefore asymmetric and unidirectional. If
          the target node also has packets to send back to the source node,
          then a separate route optimization procedure is performed in the
          reverse direction. But, there is no requirement that the forward and
          reverse paths be symmetric.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="nud" title="Neighbor Unreachability Detection (NUD)">
        <t>AERO nodes perform Neighbor Unreachability Detection (NUD) per
        <xref target="RFC4861"/> either reactively in response to persistent
        link-layer errors (see <xref target="aeroerr"/>) or proactively to
        confirm reachability and/or establish NAT state. The NUD algorithm is
        based on periodic control message exchanges. The algorithm may further
        be seeded by ND hints of forward progress, but care must be taken to
        avoid inferring reachability based on spoofed information. For
        example, authentic IPv6 ND message exchanges may be considered as
        acceptable hints of forward progress, while spurious data packets
        should not be.</t>

        <t>AERO nodes can use (OAL/ORH-encapsulated) standard NS/NA exchanges
        sent over the OMNI link spanning tree to securely test reachability
        without risk of DoS attacks from nodes pretending to be a neighbor
        (these NS/NA(NUD) messages use the unicast LLAs and ULAs of the two
        parties involved in the NUD test the same as for standard IPv6 ND, and
        both messages flow over the spanning tree). Proxys can further perform
        NUD to securely verify Server reachability on behalf of their proxyed
        Clients. However, a means for an ROS to test the unsecured target
        route optimized paths is also necessary.</t>

        <t>When an ROR directs an ROS to a target neighbor with one or more
        link-layer addresses, the ROS can proactively test each such unsecured
        route optimized path through secured NS(NUD) messages over the
        spanning tree that invoke an unsecured NA(NUD) reply that travels over
        the route optimized path.. (The NS(NUD) messages must therefore
        include Nonce and Timestamp options that will be echoed in the
        unsecured NA(NUD) replies.) While testing the paths, the ROS can
        optionally continue to send packets via the spanning tree, maintain a
        small queue of packets until target reachability is confirmed, or
        (optimistically) allow packets to flow via the route optimized
        paths.</t>

        <t>When the ROS sends an NS(NUD) message, it sets the IPv6 source to
        its own address, sets the destination to the MNP-LLA of the target,
        and sets the target's MNP Subnet-Router anycast address as the Target
        Address. The ROS also includes an OMNI option with a single Interface
        Attributes sub-option with the SRT, FMT, LHS and L2ADDR information
        for its own underlying interface it wishes to test, but sets the
        S/T-ifIndex field to the index for target's underlying interface to be
        tested. The ROS includes a Nonce and Timestamp option, then
        encapsulates the message in OAL/INET headers with its own ULA as the
        source and the ULA of the target as the destination. The ROS then
        forwards the NS(NUD) message toward the target via a Server or
        Bridge.</t>

        <t>When the target receives the NS(NUD) message, it creates an NA(NUD)
        by reversing the OAL and IPv6 addresses and including an Interface
        Attributes sub-option with attributes for its own interface identified
        by the NS(NUD) S/T-ifIndex. The target sets the NA(NUD) S/T-ifIndex to
        the index of the ROS, sets the Target Address to the same value that
        was in the NS(NUD), and returns the message using its own underlying
        interface identified by S/T-ifIndex and destined to the ROS's
        interface identified by the original Interface Attributes
        sub-option.</t>

        <t>When the ROS receives the NA(NUD) message, it can determine from
        the Nonce, Timestamp and Target Address that the message matched its
        NS(NUD) and that it transited the direct path from the ROR using the
        selected underlying interface pair. The ROS marks route optimization
        target paths that pass these NUD tests as "reachable", and those that
        do not as "unreachable". These markings inform the OMNI interface
        forwarding algorithm specified in <xref target="aeroalg"/>.</t>

        <t>Note: If the target determines that the OMNI option Interface
        Attributes in the NS(NUD) is located in a different OMNI link segment
        than its own interface named in the S/T-ifIndex, it instead returns
        the NA(NUD) via the spanning tree while including an ORH and setting
        the OAL destination address to the Subnet Router Anycast address used
        by Bridges on the ROS segment. When a Bridge on the ROS segment
        receives the NA(NUD), it replaces the Interface Attributes with
        information for its own interface while using the ifIndex value
        specific to the target.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeromob"
               title="Mobility Management and Quality of Service (QoS)">
        <t>AERO is a Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) service. Each
        Server is responsible for only a subset of the Clients on the OMNI
        link, as opposed to a Centralized Mobility Management (CMM) service
        where there is a single network mobility collective entity for all
        Clients. Clients coordinate with their associated Servers via RS/RA
        exchanges to maintain the DMM profile, and the AERO routing system
        tracks all current Client/Server peering relationships.</t>

        <t>Servers provide default routing and mobility/multilink services for
        their dependent Clients. Clients are responsible for maintaining
        neighbor relationships with their Servers through periodic RS/RA
        exchanges, which also serves to confirm neighbor reachability. When a
        Client's underlying interface address and/or QoS information changes,
        the Client is responsible for updating the Server with this new
        information. Note that when there is a Proxy in the path, the Proxy
        can also perform some RS/RA exchanges on the Client's behalf.</t>

        <t>Mobility management messaging is based on the transmission and
        reception of unsolicited Neighbor Advertisement (uNA) messages. Each
        uNA message sets the IPv6 destination address to (link-local)
        All-Nodes multicast to convey a general update of Interface Attributes
        to (possibly) multiple recipients, or to a specific unicast LLA to
        announce a departure event to a specific recipient. Implementations
        must therefore examine the destination address to determine the nature
        of the mobility event (i.e., update vs departure).</t>

        <t>Mobility management considerations are specified in the following
        sections.</t>

        <section anchor="mobman" title="Mobility Update Messaging">
          <t>Servers accommodate Client mobility, multilink and/or QoS change
          events by sending unsolicited NA (uNA) messages to each ROS in the
          target Client's Report List. When a Server sends a uNA message, it
          sets the IPv6 source address to the Client's MNP-LLA, sets the
          destination address to (link-local) All-Nodes multicast and sets the
          Target Address to the Client's Subnet-Router anycast address. The
          Server also includes an OMNI option with Prefix Length set to the
          length associated with the Client's MNP-LLA, with Interface
          Attributes for the target Client's underlying interfaces and with
          the OMNI header S/T-ifIndex set to 0. The Server then sets the NA R
          flag to 1, the S flag to 0 and the O flag to 1, then encapsulates
          the message in an OAL header with source set to its own ADM-ULA and
          destination set to the ULA of the ROS and sends the message into the
          spanning tree.</t>

          <t>As discussed in Section 7.2.6 of <xref target="RFC4861"/>, the
          transmission and reception of uNA messages is unreliable but
          provides a useful optimization. In well-connected Internetworks with
          robust data links uNA messages will be delivered with high
          probability, but in any case the Server can optionally send up to
          MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT uNAs to each ROS to increase the
          likelihood that at least one will be received.</t>

          <t>When the ROS receives a uNA message prepared as above, it ignores
          the message if there is no existing neighbor cache entry for the
          Client. Otherwise, it uses the included OMNI option information to
          update the neighbor cache entry, but does not reset ReachableTime
          since the receipt of an unsolicited NA message from the target
          Server does not provide confirmation that any forward paths to the
          target Client are working.</t>

          <t>If uNA messages are lost, the ROS may be left with stale address
          and/or QoS information for the Client for up to ReachableTime
          seconds. During this time, the ROS can continue sending packets
          according to its stale neighbor cache information. When
          ReachableTime is close to expiring, the ROS will re-initiate route
          optimization and receive fresh link-layer address information.</t>

          <t>In addition to sending uNA messages to the current set of ROSs
          for the Client, the Server also sends uNAs to the MNP-ULA associated
          with the link-layer address for any underlying interface for which
          the link-layer address has changed. These uNA messages update an old
          Proxy/Server that cannot easily detect (e.g., without active
          probing) when a formerly-active Client has departed. When the Server
          sends the uNA, it sets the IPv6 source address to the Client's
          MNP-LLA, sets the destination address to the old Proxy/Server's
          ADM-LLA, and sets the Target Address to the Client's Subnet-Router
          anycast address. The Server also includes an OMNI option with Prefix
          Length set to the length associated with the Client's MNP-LLA, with
          Interface Attributes for the changed underlying interface, and with
          the OMNI header S/T-ifIndex set to 0. The Server then sets the NA R
          flag to 1, the S flag to 0 and the O flag to 1, then encapsulates
          the message in an OAL header with source set to its own ADM-ULA and
          destination set to the ADM-ULA of the old Proxy/Server and sends the
          message into the spanning tree.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="llchange"
                 title="Announcing Link-Layer Address and/or QoS Preference Changes">
          <t>When a Client needs to change its underlying interface addresses
          and/or QoS preferences (e.g., due to a mobility event), either the
          Client or its Proxys send RS messages to the Server via the spanning
          tree with an OMNI option that includes Interface attributes with the
          new link quality and address information.</t>

          <t>Up to MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS RS messages MAY be sent in parallel
          with sending actual data packets in case one or more RAs are lost.
          If all RAs are lost, the Client SHOULD re-associate with a new
          Server.</t>

          <t>When the Server receives the Client's changes, it sends uNA
          messages to all nodes in the Report List the same as described in
          the previous section.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="newlink" title="Bringing New Links Into Service">
          <t>When a Client needs to bring new underlying interfaces into
          service (e.g., when it activates a new data link), it sends an RS
          message to the Server via the underlying interface with an OMNI
          option that includes Interface Attributes with appropriate link
          quality values and with link-layer address information for the new
          link.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="rmlink" title="Deactivating Existing Links">
          <t>When a Client needs to deactivate an existing underlying
          interface, it sends an RS or uNA message to its Server with an OMNI
          option with appropriate Interface Attribute values - in particular,
          the link quality value 0 assures that neighbors will cease to use
          the link.</t>

          <t>If the Client needs to send RS/uNA messages over an underlying
          interface other than the one being deactivated, it MUST include
          Interface Attributes with appropriate link quality values for any
          underlying interfaces being deactivated.</t>

          <t>Note that when a Client deactivates an underlying interface,
          neighbors that have received the RS/uNA messages need not purge all
          references for the underlying interface from their neighbor cache
          entries. The Client may reactivate or reuse the underlying interface
          and/or its ifIndex at a later point in time, when it will send
          RS/uNA messages with fresh Interface Attributes to update any
          neighbors.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="newsrv" title="Moving Between Servers">
          <t>The Client performs the procedures specified in <xref
          target="aeropd-client"/> when it first associates with a new Server
          or renews its association with an existing Server. The Client also
          includes MS-Release identifiers in the RS message OMNI option per
          <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> if it wants the new
          Server to notify any old Servers from which the Client is
          departing.</t>

          <t>When the new Server receives the Client's RS message, it returns
          an RA as specified in <xref target="aeropd-server"/> and sends up to
          MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTIISEMENT uNA messages to any old Servers listed
          in OMNI option MS-Release identifiers. When the new Server sends a
          uNA message, it sets the IPv6 source address to the Client's
          MNP-LLA, sets the destination address to the old Server's ADM-LLA,
          and sets the Target Address to the Client's Subnet-Router anycast
          address. The new Server also includes an OMNI option with Prefix
          Length set to the length associated with the Client's MNP-LLA, with
          Interface Attributes for its own underlying interface, and with the
          OMNI header S/T-ifIndex set to 0. The new Server then sets the NA R
          flag to 1, the S flag to 0 and the O flag to 1, then encapsulates
          the message in an OAL header with source set to its own ADM-ULA and
          destination set to the ADM-ULA of the old Server and sends the
          message into the spanning tree.</t>

          <t>When an old Server receives the uNA, it changes the Client's
          neighbor cache entry state to DEPARTED, sets the link-layer address
          of the Client to the new Server's ADM-ULA, and resets DepartTime.
          After a short delay (e.g., 2 seconds) the old Server withdraws the
          Client's MNP from the routing system. After DepartTime expires, the
          old Server deletes the Client's neighbor cache entry.</t>

          <t>The old Server also iteratively forwards a copy of the uNA
          message to each ROS in the Client's Report List by changing the OAL
          destination address to the ULA of the ROS while leaving all other
          fields of the message unmodified. When the ROS receives the uNA, it
          examines the Target address to determine the correct asymmetric
          neighbor cache entry and verifies that the IPv6 destination address
          matches the old Server. The ROS then caches the IPv6 source address
          as the new Server for the existing asymmetric neighbor cache entry
          and marks the entry as STALE. While in the STALE state, the ROS
          allows new data packets to flow according to any existing cached
          link-layer information and sends new NS(AR) messages using its own
          ULA as the OAL source and the ADM-ULA of the new Server as the OAL
          destination address to elicit NA messages that reset the asymmetric
          neighbor cache entry state to REACHABLE. If no new NA message is
          received for 10 seconds while in the STALE state, the ROS deletes
          the neighbor cache entry.</t>

          <t>Clients SHOULD NOT move rapidly between Servers in order to avoid
          causing excessive oscillations in the AERO routing system. Examples
          of when a Client might wish to change to a different Server include
          a Server that has gone unreachable, topological movements of
          significant distance, movement to a new geographic region, movement
          to a new OMNI link segment, etc.</t>

          <t>When a Client moves to a new Server, some of the fragments of a
          multiple fragment packet may have already arrived at the old Server
          while others are en route to the new Server, however no special
          attention in the reassembly algorithm is necessary when re-routed
          fragments are simply treated as loss.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="mcast" title="Multicast">
        <t>The AERO Client provides an IGMP (IPv4) <xref target="RFC2236"/> or
        MLD (IPv6) <xref target="RFC3810"/> proxy service for its EUNs and/or
        hosted applications <xref target="RFC4605"/>. The Client forwards
        IGMP/MLD messages over any of its underlying interfaces for which
        group membership is required. The IGMP/MLD messages may be further
        forwarded by a first-hop ANET access router acting as an
        IGMP/MLD-snooping switch <xref target="RFC4541"/>, then ultimately
        delivered to an AERO Proxy/Server acting as a Protocol Independent
        Multicast - Sparse-Mode (PIM-SM, or simply "PIM") Designated Router
        (DR) <xref target="RFC7761"/>. AERO Relays also act as PIM routers
        (i.e., the same as AERO Proxys/Servers) on behalf of nodes on INET/EUN
        networks. The behaviors identified in the following sections
        correspond to Source-Specific Multicast (SSM) and Any-Source Multicast
        (ASM) operational modes.</t>

        <section anchor="pim-ssm" title="Source-Specific Multicast (SSM)">
          <t>When an ROS (i.e., an AERO Proxy/Server/Relay) "X" acting as PIM
          router receives a Join/Prune message from a node on its downstream
          interfaces containing one or more ((S)ource, (G)roup) pairs, it
          updates its Multicast Routing Information Base (MRIB) accordingly.
          For each S belonging to a prefix reachable via X's non-OMNI
          interfaces, X then forwards the (S, G) Join/Prune to any PIM routers
          on those interfaces per <xref target="RFC7761"/>.</t>

          <t>For each S belonging to a prefix reachable via X's OMNI
          interface, X originates a separate copy of the Join/Prune for each
          (S,G) in the message using its own LLA as the source address and
          ALL-PIM-ROUTERS as the destination address. X then encapsulates each
          message in an OAL header with source address set to the ULA of X and
          destination address set to S then forwards the message into the
          spanning tree, which delivers it to AERO Server/Relay "Y" that
          services S. At the same time, if the message was a Join, X sends a
          route-optimization NS message toward each S the same as discussed in
          <xref target="predirect"/>. The resulting NAs will return the LLA
          for the prefix that matches S as the network-layer source address
          and with an OMNI option with the ULA corresponding to any underlying
          interfaces that are currently servicing S.</t>

          <t>When Y processes the Join/Prune message, if S located behind any
          INET, Direct, or VPNed interfaces Y acts as a PIM router and updates
          its MRIB to list X as the next hop in the reverse path. If S is
          located behind any Proxys "Z"*, Y also forwards the message to each
          Z* over the spanning tree while continuing to use the LLA of X as
          the source address. Each Z* then updates its MRIB accordingly and
          maintains the LLA of X as the next hop in the reverse path. Since
          the Bridges do not examine network layer control messages, this
          means that the (reverse) multicast tree path is simply from each Z*
          (and/or Y) to X with no other multicast-aware routers in the path.
          If any Z* (and/or Y) is located on the same OMNI link segment as X,
          the multicast data traffic sent to X directly using OAL/INET
          encapsulation instead of via a Bridge.</t>

          <t>Following the initial Join/Prune and NS/NA messaging, X maintains
          an asymmetric neighbor cache entry for each S the same as if X was
          sending unicast data traffic to S. In particular, X performs
          additional NS/NA exchanges to keep the neighbor cache entry alive
          for up to t_periodic seconds <xref target="RFC7761"/>. If no new
          Joins are received within t_periodic seconds, X allows the neighbor
          cache entry to expire. Finally, if X receives any additional
          Join/Prune messages for (S,G) it forwards the messages to each Y and
          Z* in the neighbor cache entry over the spanning tree.</t>

          <t>At some later time, Client C that holds an MNP for source S may
          depart from a first Proxy Z1 and/or connect via a new Proxy Z2. In
          that case, Y sends an unsolicited NA message to X the same as
          specified for unicast mobility in <xref target="aeromob"/>. When X
          receives the unsolicited NA message, it updates its asymmetric
          neighbor cache entry for the LLA for source S and sends new Join
          messages to any new Proxys Z2. There is no requirement to send any
          Prune messages to old Proxys Z1 since source S will no longer source
          any multicast data traffic via Z1. Instead, the multicast state for
          (S,G) in Proxy Z1 will soon time out since no new Joins will
          arrive.</t>

          <t>After some later time, C may move to a new Server Y2 and depart
          from old Sever Y1. In that case, Y1 sends Join messages for any of
          C's active (S,G) groups to Y2 while including its own LLA as the
          source address. This causes Y2 to include Y1 in the multicast
          forwarding tree during the interim time that Y1's symmetric neighbor
          cache entry for C is in the DEPARTED state. At the same time, Y1
          sends an unsolicited NA message to X with an OMNI option with
          S/T-ifIndex in the header set to 0 and a release indication to cause
          X to release its asymmetric neighbor cache entry. X then sends a new
          Join message to S via the spanning tree and re-initiates route
          optimization the same as if it were receiving a fresh Join message
          from a node on a downstream link.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="pim-asm" title="Any-Source Multicast (ASM)">
          <t>When an ROS X acting as a PIM router receives a Join/Prune from a
          node on its downstream interfaces containing one or more (*,G)
          pairs, it updates its Multicast Routing Information Base (MRIB)
          accordingly. X then forwards a copy of the message to the Rendezvous
          Point (RP) R for each G over the spanning tree. X uses its own LLA
          as the source address and ALL-PIM-ROUTERS as the destination
          address, then encapsulates each message in an OAL header with source
          address set to the ULA of X and destination address set to R, then
          sends the message into the spanning tree. At the same time, if the
          message was a Join X initiates NS/NA route optimization the same as
          for the SSM case discussed in <xref target="pim-ssm"/>.</t>

          <t>For each source S that sends multicast traffic to group G via R,
          the Proxy/Server Z* for the Client that aggregates S encapsulates
          the packets in PIM Register messages and forwards them to R via the
          spanning tree, which may then elect to send a PIM Join to Z*. This
          will result in an (S,G) tree rooted at Z* with R as the next hop so
          that R will begin to receive two copies of the packet; one native
          copy from the (S, G) tree and a second copy from the pre-existing
          (*, G) tree that still uses PIM Register encapsulation. R can then
          issue a PIM Register-stop message to suppress the
          Register-encapsulated stream. At some later time, if C moves to a
          new Proxy/Server Z*, it resumes sending packets via PIM Register
          encapsulation via the new Z*.</t>

          <t>At the same time, as multicast listeners discover individual S's
          for a given G, they can initiate an (S,G) Join for each S under the
          same procedures discussed in <xref target="pim-ssm"/>. Once the
          (S,G) tree is established, the listeners can send (S, G) Prune
          messages to R so that multicast packets for group G sourced by S
          will only be delivered via the (S, G) tree and not from the (*, G)
          tree rooted at R. All mobility considerations discussed for SSM
          apply.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="bidir-pim" title="Bi-Directional PIM (BIDIR-PIM)">
          <t>Bi-Directional PIM (BIDIR-PIM) <xref target="RFC5015"/> provides
          an alternate approach to ASM that treats the Rendezvous Point (RP)
          as a Designated Forwarder (DF). Further considerations for BIDIR-PIM
          are out of scope.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="multiaero" title="Operation over Multiple OMNI Links">
        <t>An AERO Client can connect to multiple OMNI links the same as for
        any data link service. In that case, the Client maintains a distinct
        OMNI interface for each link, e.g., 'omni0' for the first link,
        'omni1' for the second, 'omni2' for the third, etc. Each OMNI link
        would include its own distinct set of Bridges, Servers and Proxys,
        thereby providing redundancy in case of failures.</t>

        <t>Each OMNI link could utilize the same or different ANET
        connections. The links can be distinguished at the link-layer via the
        SRT prefix in a similar fashion as for Virtual Local Area Network
        (VLAN) tagging (e.g., IEEE 802.1Q) and/or through assignment of
        distinct sets of MSPs on each link. This gives rise to the opportunity
        for supporting multiple redundant networked paths, with each VLAN
        distinguished by a different SRT "color" (see: <xref
        target="srt"/>).</t>

        <t>The Client's IP layer can select the outgoing OMNI interface
        appropriate for a given traffic profile while (in the reverse
        direction) correspondent nodes must have some way of steering their
        packets destined to a target via the correct OMNI link.</t>

        <t>In a first alternative, if each OMNI link services different MSPs,
        then the Client can receive a distinct MNP from each of the links. IP
        routing will therefore assure that the correct OMNI link is used for
        both outbound and inbound traffic. This can be accomplished using
        existing technologies and approaches, and without requiring any
        special supporting code in correspondent nodes or Bridges.</t>

        <t>In a second alternative, if each OMNI link services the same MSP(s)
        then each link could assign a distinct "OMNI link Anycast" address
        that is configured by all Bridges on the link. Correspondent nodes can
        then perform Segment Routing to select the correct SRT, which will
        then direct the packet over multiple hops to the target.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="dnsconsider" title="DNS Considerations">
        <t>AERO Client MNs and INET correspondent nodes consult the Domain
        Name System (DNS) the same as for any Internetworking node. When
        correspondent nodes and Client MNs use different IP protocol versions
        (e.g., IPv4 correspondents and IPv6 MNs), the INET DNS must maintain A
        records for IPv4 address mappings to MNs which must then be populated
        in Relay NAT64 mapping caches. In that way, an IPv4 correspondent node
        can send packets to the IPv4 address mapping of the target MN, and the
        Relay will translate the IPv4 header and destination address into an
        IPv6 header and IPv6 destination address of the MN.</t>

        <t>When an AERO Client registers with an AERO Server, the Server can
        return the address(es) of DNS servers in RDNSS options <xref
        target="RFC6106"/>. The DNS server provides the IP addresses of other
        MNs and correspondent nodes in AAAA records for IPv6 or A records for
        IPv4.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="trans" title="Transition Considerations">
        <t>OAL encapsulation ensures that dissimilar INET partitions can be
        joined into a single unified OMNI link, even though the partitions
        themselves may have differing protocol versions and/or incompatible
        addressing plans. However, a commonality can be achieved by
        incrementally distributing globally routable (i.e., native) IP
        prefixes to eventually reach all nodes (both mobile and fixed) in all
        OMNI link segments. This can be accomplished by incrementally
        deploying AERO Relays on each INET partition, with each Relay
        distributing its MNPs and/or discovering non-MNP IP GUA prefixes on
        its INET links.</t>

        <t>This gives rise to the opportunity to eventually distribute native
        IP addresses to all nodes, and to present a unified OMNI link view
        even if the INET partitions remain in their current protocol and
        addressing plans. In that way, the OMNI link can serve the dual
        purpose of providing a mobility/multilink service and a transition
        service. Or, if an INET partition is transitioned to a native IP
        protocol version and addressing scheme that is compatible with the
        OMNI link MNP-based addressing scheme, the partition and OMNI link can
        be joined by Relays.</t>

        <t>Relays that connect INETs/EUNs with dissimilar IP protocol versions
        may need to employ a network address and protocol translation function
        such as NAT64 <xref target="RFC6146"/>.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Detecting and Reacting to Server and Bridge Failures">
        <t>In environments where rapid failure recovery is required, Servers
        and Bridges SHOULD use Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) <xref
        target="RFC5880"/>. Nodes that use BFD can quickly detect and react to
        failures so that cached information is re-established through
        alternate nodes. BFD control messaging is carried only over
        well-connected ground domain networks (i.e., and not low-end radio
        links) and can therefore be tuned for rapid response.</t>

        <t>Servers and Bridges maintain BFD sessions in parallel with their
        BGP peerings. If a Server or Bridge fails, BGP peers will quickly
        re-establish routes through alternate paths the same as for common BGP
        deployments. Similarly, Proxys maintain BFD sessions with their
        associated Bridges even though they do not establish BGP peerings with
        them.</t>

        <t>Proxys SHOULD use proactive NUD for Servers for which there are
        currently active ANET Clients in a manner that parallels BFD, i.e., by
        sending unicast NS messages in rapid succession to receive solicited
        NA messages. When the Proxy is also sending RS messages on behalf of
        ANET Clients, the RS/RA messaging can be considered as equivalent
        hints of forward progress. This means that the Proxy need not also
        send a periodic NS if it has already sent an RS within the same
        period. If a Server fails, the Proxy will cease to receive
        advertisements and can quickly inform Clients of the outage by sending
        multicast RA messages on the ANET interface.</t>

        <t>The Proxy sends multicast RA messages with source address set to
        the Server's address, destination address set to (link-local)
        All-Nodes multicast, and Router Lifetime set to 0. The Proxy SHOULD
        send MAX_FINAL_RTR_ADVERTISEMENTS RA messages separated by small
        delays <xref target="RFC4861"/>. Any Clients on the ANET interface
        that have been using the (now defunct) Server will receive the RA
        messages and associate with a new Server.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="crazyclient" title="AERO Clients on the Open Internet">
        <t>AERO Clients that connect to the open Internet via INET interfaces
        can establish a VPN or direct link to securely connect to a Server in
        a "tethered" arrangement with all of the Client's traffic transiting
        the Server. Alternatively, the Client can associate with an INET
        Server using UDP/IP encapsulation and control message securing
        services as discussed in the following sections.</t>

        <t>When a Client's OMNI interface enables an INET underlying
        interface, it first determines whether the interface is likely to be
        behind a NAT. For IPv4, the Client assumes it is on the open Internet
        if the INET address is not a special-use IPv4 address per <xref
        target="RFC3330"/>. Similarly for IPv6, the Client assumes it is on
        the open Internet if the INET address is a Global Unicast Address
        (GUA) <xref target="RFC4291"/>. Otherwise, the Client assumes it may
        be behind one or several NATs.</t>

        <t>The Client then prepares an RS message with IPv6 source address set
        to its MNP-LLA, with IPv6 destination set to (link-local) All-Routers
        multicast and with an OMNI option with underlying interface
        attributes. If the Client believes that it is on the open Internet, it
        SHOULD include an L2ADDR in the Interface Attributes sub-option
        corresponding to the underlying interface; otherwise, it MAY omit
        L2ADDR. If the underlying address is IPv4, the Client includes the
        Port Number and IPv4 address written in obfuscated form <xref
        target="RFC4380"/> as discussed in <xref target="interface"/>. If the
        underlying interface address is IPv6, the Client instead includes the
        Port Number and IPv6 address in obfuscated form. The Client finally
        includes a HIP "Initiator" message sub-option in the OMNI option <xref
        target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> to provide message
        authentication and performs OAL encapsulation and fragmentation if
        necessary. The Client then encapsulates each fragment in UDP/IP
        headers, sets the UDP/IP source to its INET address and UDP port, sets
        the UDP/IP destination to the Server's INET address and the AERO
        service port number (8060), then sends the (whole or fragmented)
        message to the Server.</t>

        <t>When the Server receives the RS, it performs OAL reassembly if
        necessary then authenticates the message and registers the Client's
        MNP and INET interface information according to the OMNI option
        parameters. If the RS message OMNI option includes Interface
        Attributes with an L2ADDR, the Server compares the encapsulation IP
        address and UDP port number with the (unobfuscated) values. If the
        values are the same, the Server caches the Client's information as
        "INET" addresses meaning that the Client is likely to accept direct
        messages without requiring NAT traversal exchanges. If the values are
        different (or, if the OMNI option did not include an L2ADDR) the
        Server instead caches the Client's information as "mapped" addresses
        meaning that NAT traversal exchanges may be necessary.</t>

        <t>The Server then prepares an RA message with IPv6 source and
        destination set corresponding to the addresses in the RS, and with an
        OMNI option with an Origin Indication sub-option per <xref
        target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> with the mapped and
        obfuscated Port Number and IP address observed in the encapsulation
        headers. The Server also includes a HIP "Responder" message sub-option
        per <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> that contains an
        acknowledgement of the update sent by the Client. The Server then
        performs OAL encapsulation and fragmentation if necessary, and
        encapsulates each fragment in UDP/IP headers with adresses set per the
        L2ADDR information in the neighbor cache entry for the Client.</t>

        <t>When the Client receives the RA message, it performs OAL reassembly
        if necessary, authenticates the HIP "Responder" message, then compares
        the mapped Port Number and IP address from the Origin Indication
        sub-option with its own address. If the addresses are the same, the
        Client assumes the open Internet / Cone NAT principle; if the
        addresses are different, the Client instead assumes that further
        qualification procedures are necessary to detect the type of NAT and
        proceeds according to standard procedures <xref
        target="RFC6081"/><xref target="RFC4380"/>.</t>

        <t>After the Client has registered its INET interfaces in such RS/RA
        exchanges it sends periodic RS messages to receive fresh RA messages
        before the Router Lifetime received on each INET interface expires.
        The Client also maintains default routes via its Servers, i.e., the
        same as described in earlier sections.</t>

        <t>When the Client sends messages to target IP addresses, it also
        invokes route optimization per <xref target="predirect"/> using IPv6
        ND address resolution messaging. The Client sends the NS(AR) message
        to the Server with an OMNI option with a HIP "Update/Sequence" message
        sub-option. The Client sets the NS source address to the Client's
        MNP-LLA and destination address to the target solicited node multicast
        address. The Client wraps the NS message in an OAL header with source
        address set to its own MNP-ULA and destination address set to the
        Server's ADM-ULA. The Client then performs OAL fragmentation if
        necessary, wraps each fragment in a UDP/IP header and sends it to the
        Server.</t>

        <t>When the Server receives the OAL-encapsulated NS, it performs OAL
        reassembly if necessary. The Server then authenticates the message by
        processing the HIP message sub-option and sends a corresponding NS(AR)
        message over the spanning tree the same as if it were the ROS, but
        with the OAL source address set to the Server's ADM-ULA, with
        destination set to the MNP-ULA of the target, and with an OMNI option
        that includes no sub-options. When the ROR receives the NS(AR), it
        adds the Server's ADM-ULA and Client's MNP-LLA to the target's Report
        List, and returns an NA(AR) with OMNI option information for the
        target including all of the target's Interface Attributes. The ROR
        sets the NA(AR) source address to the target's MNP-LLA and sets the
        destination address to the Client's MNP-LLA, then sets the OAL source
        address to the ADM-ULA of the ROR and the destination to the ADM-ULA
        of the Server. When the Server receives the NA(AR) message, it
        rewrites the OAL source address to its own ADM-ULA and the destination
        address to the MNP-ULA of the Client, then includes a HIP
        "Update/Acknowledge" message sub-option in the OMNI option, performs
        OAL fragmentation if necessary, wraps each fragment in UDP/IP headers,
        and sends it to the Client.</t>

        <t>Following route optimization for targets in the same OMNI link
        segment, if the target's L2ADDR is on the open INET, the Client
        forwards data packets directly to the target INET address. If the
        target is behind a NAT, the Client first establishes NAT state for the
        L2ADDR using the "direct bubble" and NUD mechanisms discussed in <xref
        target="cforw"/>. The Client continues to send data packets via its
        Server until NAT state is populated, then begins forwarding packets
        via the direct path through the NAT to the target. For targets in
        different OMNI link segments, the Client uses OAL/ORH encapsulation
        and forwards data packets to the Bridge that returned the NA
        message.</t>

        <t>The ROR may return uNAs via the Server if the target moves, and the
        Server will send corresponding uNAs to the Client with a HIP "Notify"
        authentication message. The Client can also send NUD messages to test
        forward path reachability even though there is no security association
        between the Client and the target.</t>

        <t>The Client sends UDP/IP encapsulated IPv6 packets to
        route-optimized neighbors in the same OMNI link segment no larger than
        576 bytes in one piece and without OAL encapsulation. Otherwise, the
        Client inserts an OAL header with source set to its own MNP-ULA and
        destination set to the MNP-ULA of the target and uses OAL
        fragmentation if necessary according to <xref target="aeromtu"/>. The
        Client then encapsulates each fragment in a UDP/IP header and sends
        the fragments to the next hop.</t>

        <t>Note: The NAT traversal procedures specified in this document are
        applicable for Cone, Address-Restricted and Port-Restricted NATs only.
        While future updates to this document may specify procedures for other
        NAT variations (e.g., hairpinning and various forms of Symmetric
        NATs), it should be noted that continuous communications are always
        possible through forwarding via a Server even if NAT traversal is not
        employed.</t>

        <t>Note: Following the initial HIP Initiator/Responder exchange, AERO
        Clients with OMNI interfaces configured over the open Internet
        maintain HIP associations through the transmission of IPv6 ND messages
        that include OMNI options with HIP "Update" and "Notify" messages.
        OMNI interfaces use the HIP "Update" message when an acknowledgement
        is required, and use the "Notify" message in unacknowledged isolated
        IPv6 ND messages (e.g., unsolicited NAs).</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="reuse" title="Time-Varying MNPs">
        <t>In some use cases, it is desirable, beneficial and efficient for
        the Client to receive a constant MNP that travels with the Client
        wherever it moves. For example, this would allow air traffic
        controllers to easily track aircraft, etc. In other cases, however
        (e.g., intelligent transportation systems), the MN may be willing to
        sacrifice a modicum of efficiency in order to have time-varying MNPs
        that can be changed every so often to defeat adversarial tracking.</t>

        <t>The DHCPv6 service offers a way for Clients that desire
        time-varying MNPs to obtain short-lived prefixes (e.g., on the order
        of a small number of minutes). In that case, the identity of the
        Client would not be bound to the MNP but rather the Client's identity
        would be bound to the DHCPv6 Device Unique Identifier (DUID) and used
        as the seed for Prefix Delegation. The Client would then be obligated
        to renumber its internal networks whenever its MNP (and therefore also
        its MNP-LLA) changes. This should not present a challenge for Clients
        with automated network renumbering services, however presents limits
        for the durations of ongoing sessions that would prefer to use a
        constant address.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="implement" title="Implementation Status">
      <t>An early AERO implementation based on OpenVPN (https://openvpn.net/)
      was announced on the v6ops mailing list on January 10, 2018 and an
      initial public release of the AERO proof-of-concept source code was
      announced on the intarea mailing list on August 21, 2015.</t>

      <t>AERO Release-3.0.2 was tagged on October 15, 2020, and is undergoing
      internal testing. Additional internal releases expected within the
      coming months, with first public release expected end of 1H2021.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="iana" title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>The IANA is instructed to assign a new type value TBD in the IPv6
      Routing Types registry.</t>

      <t>The IANA has assigned the UDP port number "8060" for an earlier
      experimental first version of AERO <xref target="RFC6706"/>. This
      document obsoletes <xref target="RFC6706"/>, and together with <xref
      target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> reclaims the UDP port number
      "8060" for 'aero' as the service port for UDP/IP encapsualtion. (Note
      that, although <xref target="RFC6706"/> was not widely implemented or
      deployed, any messages coded to that specification can be easily
      distinguished and ignored since they use the invalid ICMPv6 message type
      number '0'.) This document makes no request of IANA, since <xref
      target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/> already provides
      instructions.</t>

      <t>No further IANA actions are required.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="secure" title="Security Considerations">
      <t>AERO Bridges configure secured tunnels with AERO Servers, Relays and
      Proxys within their local OMNI link segments. Applicable secured tunnel
      alternatives include IPsec <xref target="RFC4301"/>, TLS/SSL <xref
      target="RFC8446"/>, DTLS <xref target="RFC6347"/>, WireGuard <xref
      target="WG"/>, etc. The AERO Bridges of all OMNI link segments in turn
      configure secured tunnels for their neighboring AERO Bridges in a
      spanning tree topology. Therefore, control messages exchanged between
      any pair of OMNI link neighbors on the spanning tree are already
      secured.</t>

      <t>AERO Servers, Relays and Proxys targeted by a route optimization may
      also receive data packets directly from arbitrary nodes in INET
      partitions instead of via the spanning tree. For INET partitions that
      apply effective ingress filtering to defeat source address spoofing, the
      simple data origin authentication procedures in <xref
      target="aeroauth"/> can be applied.</t>

      <t>For INET partitions that require strong security in the data plane,
      two options for securing communications include 1) disable route
      optimization so that all traffic is conveyed over secured tunnels, or 2)
      enable on-demand secure tunnel creation between INET partition
      neighbors. Option 1) would result in longer routes than necessary and
      traffic concentration on critical infrastructure elements. Option 2)
      could be coordinated by establishing a secured tunnel on-demand instead
      of performing an NS/NA exchange in the route optimization procedures.
      Procedures for establishing on-demand secured tunnels are out of
      scope.</t>

      <t>AERO Clients that connect to secured ANETs need not apply security to
      their ND messages, since the messages will be intercepted by a perimeter
      Proxy that applies security on its INET-facing interface as part of the
      spanning tree (see above). AERO Clients connected to the open INET can
      use symmetric network and/or transport layer security services such as
      VPNs or can by some other means establish a direct link. When a VPN or
      direct link may be impractical, however, the HIP-based authentication
      services specified in <xref target="RFC7401"/> should be applied.</t>

      <t>Application endpoints SHOULD use application-layer security services
      such as TLS/SSL, DTLS or SSH <xref target="RFC4251"/> to assure the same
      level of protection as for critical secured Internet services. AERO
      Clients that require host-based VPN services SHOULD use symmetric
      network and/or transport layer security services such as IPsec, TLS/SSL,
      DTLS, etc. AERO Proxys and Servers can also provide a network-based VPN
      service on behalf of the Client, e.g., if the Client is located within a
      secured enclave and cannot establish a VPN on its own behalf.</t>

      <t>AERO Servers and Bridges present targets for traffic amplification
      Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. This concern is no different than for
      widely-deployed VPN security gateways in the Internet, where attackers
      could send spoofed packets to the gateways at high data rates. This can
      be mitigated by connecting Servers and Bridges over dedicated links with
      no connections to the Internet and/or when connections to the Internet
      are only permitted through well-managed firewalls. Traffic amplification
      DoS attacks can also target an AERO Client's low data rate links. This
      is a concern not only for Clients located on the open Internet but also
      for Clients in secured enclaves. AERO Servers and Proxys can institute
      rate limits that protect Clients from receiving packet floods that could
      DoS low data rate links.</t>

      <t>AERO Relays must implement ingress filtering to avoid a spoofing
      attack in which spurious messages with ULA addresses are injected into
      an OMNI link from an outside attacker. AERO Clients MUST ensure that
      their connectivity is not used by unauthorized nodes on their EUNs to
      gain access to a protected network, i.e., AERO Clients that act as
      routers MUST NOT provide routing services for unauthorized nodes. (This
      concern is no different than for ordinary hosts that receive an IP
      address delegation but then "share" the address with other nodes via
      some form of Internet connection sharing such as tethering.)</t>

      <t>The MAP list MUST be well-managed and secured from unauthorized
      tampering, even though the list contains only public information. The
      MAP list can be conveyed to the Client in a similar fashion as in <xref
      target="RFC5214"/> (e.g., through layer 2 data link login messaging,
      secure upload of a static file, DNS lookups, etc.).</t>

      <t>SRH authentication facilities are specified in <xref
      target="RFC8754"/>.</t>

      <t>Security considerations for accepting link-layer ICMP messages and
      reflected packets are discussed throughout the document.</t>

      <t>Security considerations for IPv6 fragmentation and reassembly are
      discussed in <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"/>.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="ack" title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>Discussions in the IETF, aviation standards communities and private
      exchanges helped shape some of the concepts in this work. Individuals
      who contributed insights include Mikael Abrahamsson, Mark Andrews, Fred
      Baker, Bob Braden, Stewart Bryant, Brian Carpenter, Wojciech Dec, Pavel
      Drasil, Ralph Droms, Adrian Farrel, Nick Green, Sri Gundavelli, Brian
      Haberman, Bernhard Haindl, Joel Halpern, Tom Herbert, Sascha Hlusiak,
      Lee Howard, Zdenek Jaron, Andre Kostur, Hubert Kuenig, Ted Lemon, Andy
      Malis, Satoru Matsushima, Tomek Mrugalski, Madhu Niraula, Alexandru
      Petrescu, Behcet Saikaya, Michal Skorepa, Joe Touch, Bernie Volz, Ryuji
      Wakikawa, Tony Whyman, Lloyd Wood and James Woodyatt. Members of the
      IESG also provided valuable input during their review process that
      greatly improved the document. Special thanks go to Stewart Bryant, Joel
      Halpern and Brian Haberman for their shepherding guidance during the
      publication of the AERO first edition.</t>

      <t>This work has further been encouraged and supported by Boeing
      colleagues including Kyle Bae, M. Wayne Benson, Dave Bernhardt, Cam
      Brodie, John Bush, Balaguruna Chidambaram, Irene Chin, Bruce Cornish,
      Claudiu Danilov, Don Dillenburg, Joe Dudkowski, Wen Fang, Samad
      Farooqui, Anthony Gregory, Jeff Holland, Seth Jahne, Brian Jaury, Greg
      Kimberly, Ed King, Madhuri Madhava Badgandi, Laurel Matthew, Gene
      MacLean III, Rob Muszkiewicz, Sean O'Sullivan, Vijay Rajagopalan, Greg
      Saccone, Rod Santiago, Kent Shuey, Brian Skeen, Mike Slane, Carrie
      Spiker, Katie Tran, Brendan Williams, Amelia Wilson, Julie Wulff, Yueli
      Yang, Eric Yeh and other members of the Boeing mobility, networking and
      autonomy teams. Kyle Bae, Wayne Benson, Katie Tran and Eric Yeh are
      especially acknowledged for implementing the AERO functions as
      extensions to the public domain OpenVPN distribution.</t>

      <t>Earlier works on NBMA tunneling approaches are found in <xref
      target="RFC2529"/><xref target="RFC5214"/><xref target="RFC5569"/>.</t>

      <t>Many of the constructs presented in this second edition of AERO are
      based on the author's earlier works, including:</t>

      <t><list style="symbols">
          <t>The Internet Routing Overlay Network (IRON) <xref
          target="RFC6179"/><xref target="I-D.templin-ironbis"/></t>

          <t>Virtual Enterprise Traversal (VET) <xref target="RFC5558"/><xref
          target="I-D.templin-intarea-vet"/></t>

          <t>The Subnetwork Encapsulation and Adaptation Layer (SEAL) <xref
          target="RFC5320"/><xref target="I-D.templin-intarea-seal"/></t>

          <t>AERO, First Edition <xref target="RFC6706"/></t>
        </list>Note that these works cite numerous earlier efforts that are
      not also cited here due to space limitations. The authors of those
      earlier works are acknowledged for their insights.</t>

      <t>This work is aligned with the NASA Safe Autonomous Systems Operation
      (SASO) program under NASA contract number NNA16BD84C.</t>

      <t>This work is aligned with the FAA as per the SE2025 contract number
      DTFAWA-15-D-00030.</t>

      <t>This work is aligned with the Boeing Commercial Airplanes (BCA)
      Internet of Things (IoT) and autonomy programs.</t>

      <t>This work is aligned with the Boeing Information Technology (BIT)
      MobileNet program.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4380"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0791"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0792"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8174"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8200"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6081"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7401"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3972"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4861"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4862"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2473"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.5175"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8415"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3971"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4191"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-6man-omni-interface"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4193"?>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2464"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2004"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.4213"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6347"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7333"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4271"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2529"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5214"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4301"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5569"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3810"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4605"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4541"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.4607"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7761"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2236"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5880"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6438"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6706"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.4963"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.6864"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6146"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8402"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.7421"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8754"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2003"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5522"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4291"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6935"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6936"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8446"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3330"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.2923"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.3819"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4443"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1812"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.2492"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.8138"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.7739"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.5871"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.1191"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.8201"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1035"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6273"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4982"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6179"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5320"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5558"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6106"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.2784"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.2890"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.8086"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4251"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2983"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3168"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.2764"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6221"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.7269"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4511"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5015"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.RFC.1122"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4389"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4122"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6355"?>

      <reference anchor="OVPN">
        <front>
          <title>http://openvpn.net</title>

          <author fullname="OpenVPN" initials="O" surname="OpenVPN">
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="October" year="2016"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="BGP">
        <front>
          <title>BGP in 2015, http://potaroo.net</title>

          <author fullname="Geoff Huston" initials="G." surname="Huston">
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="January" year="2016"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="WG">
        <front>
          <title>Wireguard, https://www.wireguard.com</title>

          <author fullname="team@wireguard.com" initials="" surname="">
            <organization>Wireguard</organization>
          </author>

          <date month="August" year="2020"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <?rfc #include="reference.I-D.ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-ironbis"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-intarea-seal"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-intarea-vet"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-ipwave-uam-its"?>

      <?rfc #include="reference.I-D.templin-intarea-grefrag"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-intarea-tunnels"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-6man-dhcpv6-ndopt"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-v6ops-pdhost"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.bonica-6man-crh-helper-opt"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-intarea-frag-fragile"?>
    </references>

    <section anchor="misc" title="Non-Normative Considerations">
      <t>AERO can be applied to a multitude of Internetworking scenarios, with
      each having its own adaptations. The following considerations are
      provided as non-normative guidance:</t>

      <section anchor="rorefresh"
               title="Implementation Strategies for Route Optimization">
        <t>Route optimization as discussed in <xref target="predirect"/>
        results in the route optimization source (ROS) creating an asymmetric
        neighbor cache entry for the target neighbor. The neighbor cache entry
        is maintained for at most ReachableTime seconds and then deleted
        unless updated. In order to refresh the neighbor cache entry lifetime
        before the ReachableTime timer expires, the specification requires
        implementations to issue a new NS/NA exchange to reset ReachableTime
        while data packets are still flowing. However, the decision of when to
        initiate a new NS/NA exchange and to perpetuate the process is left as
        an implementation detail.</t>

        <t>One possible strategy may be to monitor the neighbor cache entry
        watching for data packets for (ReachableTime - 5) seconds. If any data
        packets have been sent to the neighbor within this timeframe, then
        send an NS to receive a new NA. If no data packets have been sent,
        wait for 5 additional seconds and send an immediate NS if any data
        packets are sent within this "expiration pending" 5 second window. If
        no additional data packets are sent within the 5 second window, delete
        the neighbor cache entry.</t>

        <t>The monitoring of the neighbor data packet traffic therefore
        becomes an asymmetric ongoing process during the neighbor cache entry
        lifetime. If the neighbor cache entry expires, future data packets
        will trigger a new NS/NA exchange while the packets themselves are
        delivered over a longer path until route optimization state is
        re-established.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="imcplicit" title="Implicit Mobility Management">
        <t>OMNI interface neighbors MAY provide a configuration option that
        allows them to perform implicit mobility management in which no ND
        messaging is used. In that case, the Client only transmits packets
        over a single interface at a time, and the neighbor always observes
        packets arriving from the Client from the same link-layer source
        address.</t>

        <t>If the Client's underlying interface address changes (either due to
        a readdressing of the original interface or switching to a new
        interface) the neighbor immediately updates the neighbor cache entry
        for the Client and begins accepting and sending packets according to
        the Client's new address. This implicit mobility method applies to use
        cases such as cellphones with both WiFi and Cellular interfaces where
        only one of the interfaces is active at a given time, and the Client
        automatically switches over to the backup interface if the primary
        interface fails.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="direct" title="Direct Underlying Interfaces">
        <t>When a Client's OMNI interface is configured over a Direct
        interface, the neighbor at the other end of the Direct link can
        receive packets without any encapsulation. In that case, the Client
        sends packets over the Direct link according to QoS preferences. If
        the Direct interface has the highest QoS preference, then the Client's
        IP packets are transmitted directly to the peer without going through
        an ANET/INET. If other interfaces have higher QoS preferences, then
        the Client's IP packets are transmitted via a different interface,
        which may result in the inclusion of Proxys, Servers and Bridges in
        the communications path. Direct interfaces must be tested periodically
        for reachability, e.g., via NUD.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroarch"
               title="AERO Critical Infrastructure Considerations">
        <t>AERO Bridges can be either Commercial off-the Shelf (COTS) standard
        IP routers or virtual machines in the cloud. Bridges must be
        provisioned, supported and managed by the INET administrative
        authority, and connected to the Bridges of other INETs via
        inter-domain peerings. Cost for purchasing, configuring and managing
        Bridges is nominal even for very large OMNI links.</t>

        <t>AERO Servers can be standard dedicated server platforms, but most
        often will be deployed as virtual machines in the cloud. The only
        requirements for Servers are that they can run the AERO user-level
        code and have at least one network interface connection to the INET.
        As with Bridges, Servers must be provisioned, supported and managed by
        the INET administrative authority. Cost for purchasing, configuring
        and managing Servers is nominal especially for virtual Servers hosted
        in the cloud.</t>

        <t>AERO Proxys are most often standard dedicated server platforms with
        one network interface connected to the ANET and a second interface
        connected to an INET. As with Servers, the only requirements are that
        they can run the AERO user-level code and have at least one interface
        connection to the INET. Proxys must be provisioned, supported and
        managed by the ANET administrative authority. Cost for purchasing,
        configuring and managing Proxys is nominal, and borne by the ANET
        administrative authority.</t>

        <t>AERO Relays can be any dedicated server or COTS router platform
        connected to INETs and/or EUNs. The Relay connects to the OMNI link
        and engages in eBGP peering with one or more Bridges as a stub AS. The
        Relay then injects its MNPs and/or non-MNP prefixes into the BGP
        routing system, and provisions the prefixes to its downstream-attached
        networks. The Relay can perform ROS/ROR services the same as for any
        Server, and can route between the MNP and non-MNP address spaces.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="servefail" title="AERO Server Failure Implications">
        <t>AERO Servers may appear as a single point of failure in the
        architecture, but such is not the case since all Servers on the link
        provide identical services and loss of a Server does not imply
        immediate and/or comprehensive communication failures. Although
        Clients typically associate with a single Server at a time, Server
        failure is quickly detected and conveyed by Bidirectional Forward
        Detection (BFD) and/or proactive NUD allowing Clients to migrate to
        new Servers.</t>

        <t>If a Server fails, ongoing packet forwarding to Clients will
        continue by virtue of the asymmetric neighbor cache entries that have
        already been established in route optimization sources (ROSs). If a
        Client also experiences mobility events at roughly the same time the
        Server fails, unsolicited NA messages may be lost but proxy neighbor
        cache entries in the DEPARTED state will ensure that packet forwarding
        to the Client's new locations will continue for up to DepartTime
        seconds.</t>

        <t>If a Client is left without a Server for an extended timeframe
        (e.g., greater than ReachableTime seconds) then existing asymmetric
        neighbor cache entries will eventually expire and both ongoing and new
        communications will fail. The original source will continue to
        retransmit until the Client has established a new Server relationship,
        after which time continuous communications will resume.</t>

        <t>Therefore, providing many Servers on the link with high
        availability profiles provides resilience against loss of individual
        Servers and assurance that Clients can establish new Server
        relationships quickly in event of a Server failure.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="clisrv" title="AERO Client / Server Architecture">
        <t>The AERO architectural model is client / server in the control
        plane, with route optimization in the data plane. The same as for
        common Internet services, the AERO Client discovers the addresses of
        AERO Servers and selects one Server to connect to. The AERO service is
        analogous to common Internet services such as google.com, yahoo.com,
        cnn.com, etc. However, there is only one AERO service for the link and
        all Servers provide identical services.</t>

        <t>Common Internet services provide differing strategies for
        advertising server addresses to clients. The strategy is conveyed
        through the DNS resource records returned in response to name
        resolution queries. As of January 2020 Internet-based 'nslookup'
        services were used to determine the following:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>When a client resolves the domainname "google.com", the DNS
            always returns one A record (i.e., an IPv4 address) and one AAAA
            record (i.e., an IPv6 address). The client receives the same
            addresses each time it resolves the domainname via the same DNS
            resolver, but may receive different addresses when it resolves the
            domainname via different DNS resolvers. But, in each case, exactly
            one A and one AAAA record are returned.</t>

            <t>When a client resolves the domainname "ietf.org", the DNS
            always returns one A record and one AAAA record with the same
            addresses regardless of which DNS resolver is used.</t>

            <t>When a client resolves the domainname "yahoo.com", the DNS
            always returns a list of 4 A records and 4 AAAA records. Each time
            the client resolves the domainname via the same DNS resolver, the
            same list of addresses are returned but in randomized order (i.e.,
            consistent with a DNS round-robin strategy). But, interestingly,
            the same addresses are returned (albeit in randomized order) when
            the domainname is resolved via different DNS resolvers.</t>

            <t>When a client resolves the domainname "amazon.com", the DNS
            always returns a list of 3 A records and no AAAA records. As with
            "yahoo.com", the same three A records are returned from any
            worldwide Internet connection point in randomized order.</t>
          </list>The above example strategies show differing approaches to
        Internet resilience and service distribution offered by major Internet
        services. The Google approach exposes only a single IPv4 and a single
        IPv6 address to clients. Clients can then select whichever IP protocol
        version offers the best response, but will always use the same IP
        address according to the current Internet connection point. This means
        that the IP address offered by the network must lead to a
        highly-available server and/or service distribution point. In other
        words, resilience is predicated on high availability within the
        network and with no client-initiated failovers expected (i.e., it is
        all-or-nothing from the client's perspective). However, Google does
        provide for worldwide distributed service distribution by virtue of
        the fact that each Internet connection point responds with a different
        IPv6 and IPv4 address. The IETF approach is like google
        (all-or-nothing from the client's perspective), but provides only a
        single IPv4 or IPv6 address on a worldwide basis. This means that the
        addresses must be made highly-available at the network level with no
        client failover possibility, and if there is any worldwide service
        distribution it would need to be conducted by a network element that
        is reached via the IP address acting as a service distribution
        point.</t>

        <t>In contrast to the Google and IETF philosophies, Yahoo and Amazon
        both provide clients with a (short) list of IP addresses with Yahoo
        providing both IP protocol versions and Amazon as IPv4-only. The order
        of the list is randomized with each name service query response, with
        the effect of round-robin load balancing for service distribution.
        With a short list of addresses, there is still expectation that the
        network will implement high availability for each address but in case
        any single address fails the client can switch over to using a
        different address. The balance then becomes one of function in the
        network vs function in the end system.</t>

        <t>The same implications observed for common highly-available services
        in the Internet apply also to the AERO client/server architecture.
        When an AERO Client connects to one or more ANETs, it discovers one or
        more AERO Server addresses through the mechanisms discussed in earlier
        sections. Each Server address presumably leads to a fault-tolerant
        clustering arrangement such as supported by Linux-HA, Extended Virtual
        Synchrony or Paxos. Such an arrangement has precedence in common
        Internet service deployments in lightweight virtual machines without
        requiring expensive hardware deployment. Similarly, common Internet
        service deployments set service IP addresses on service distribution
        points that may relay requests to many different servers.</t>

        <t>For AERO, the expectation is that a combination of the Google/IETF
        and Yahoo/Amazon philosophies would be employed. The AERO Client
        connects to different ANET access points and can receive 1-2 Server
        ADM-LLAs at each point. It then selects one AERO Server address, and
        engages in RS/RA exchanges with the same Server from all ANET
        connections. The Client remains with this Server unless or until the
        Server fails, in which case it can switch over to an alternate Server.
        The Client can likewise switch over to a different Server at any time
        if there is some reason for it to do so. So, the AERO expectation is
        for a balance of function in the network and end system, with fault
        tolerance and resilience at both levels.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="changes" title="Change Log">
      <t>&lt;&lt; RFC Editor - remove prior to publication &gt;&gt;</t>

      <t>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-61 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-62:<list style="symbols">
          <t>New sub-section on OMNI Neighbor Interface Attributes</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-59 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-60:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Removed all references to S/TLLAO - all Interface Attributes are
          now maintained completely in the OMNI option.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-58 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-59:<list style="symbols">
          <t>The term "Relay" used in older draft versions is now "Bridge".
          "Relay" now refers to what was formally called: "Gateway".</t>

          <t>Fine-grained cleanup of Forwarding Algorithm; IPv6 ND message
          addressing; OMNI Prefix Lengths, etc.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-54 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-55:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Updates on Segment Routing and S/TLLAO contents.</t>

          <t>Various editorials and addressing cleanups.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-52 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-53:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Normative reference to the OMNI spec, and remove portions that
          are already specified in OMNI.</t>

          <t>Renamed "AERO interface/link" to "OMIN interface/link" throughout
          the document.</t>

          <t>Truncated obsolete back section matter.</t>
        </list></t>
    </section>
  </back>
</rfc>
